Another Law Post With Distinctly Small Audience Potential

This week from me at The Court: brief commentary on the Supreme Court’s decision in R. v. J.H.S., a case about the necessity of preserving the principle of “beyond reasonable doubt” in the jury instruction process in criminal trials, and what that necessity requires.

Tell The World: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • De.lirio.us
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • feedmelinks
  • Fark

3 Responses to “Another Law Post With Distinctly Small Audience Potential”

  1. Andre Says:

    I saw the words Supreme Court and my little future 1L brain lit up, but then I realized that its not…you know, for me.

    Just kidding, this is actually pretty interesting. 7-0, as well. Usually, a judge has some type of niggling little detail he has to go of about.

  2. john Says:

    Please continue these by all means, it’s a fascinating look into a part of society I have not interacted with often.

  3. it-box Says:

    MGK - Precedents and caselaw are one of my absolute favourite things in the world. I’ve not been reading these because at present my brain is threatening to dribble out of my ears due to finals but when (oh glorious day) I finish I will get on these like gum on a shoe.

Leave a Reply