<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Get Too Cocky, Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2009/02/24/dont-get-too-cocky-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2009/02/24/dont-get-too-cocky-canada/</link>
	<description>Christopher Bird writes about things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 01:17:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Courts and Technology: Head Scratching Edition &#124; BlogFox</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2009/02/24/dont-get-too-cocky-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-20853</link>
		<dc:creator>The Courts and Technology: Head Scratching Edition &#124; BlogFox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2009/02/24/dont-get-too-cocky-canada/#comment-20853</guid>
		<description>[...] article does a fine job of detailing the case, and also the slippery slope this entails - but as MGK points out this is almost certainly going to the Supreme Court. Christopher (who is as adept at blogging about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] article does a fine job of detailing the case, and also the slippery slope this entails &#8211; but as MGK points out this is almost certainly going to the Supreme Court. Christopher (who is as adept at blogging about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ithidet</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2009/02/24/dont-get-too-cocky-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-20821</link>
		<dc:creator>Ithidet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:24:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2009/02/24/dont-get-too-cocky-canada/#comment-20821</guid>
		<description>I rad it in hunter s. thompsons voice. it makes everything better.

or reading things with gilbert godfrieds voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rad it in hunter s. thompsons voice. it makes everything better.</p>
<p>or reading things with gilbert godfrieds voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Mohareb</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2009/02/24/dont-get-too-cocky-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-20817</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Mohareb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2009/02/24/dont-get-too-cocky-canada/#comment-20817</guid>
		<description>I assumed it was to be read in Han Solo&#039;s voice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assumed it was to be read in Han Solo&#8217;s voice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Brown</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2009/02/24/dont-get-too-cocky-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-20807</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:34:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2009/02/24/dont-get-too-cocky-canada/#comment-20807</guid>
		<description>Maybe this is simplistic, but for me the answer seems to be &quot;the law should be changed.&quot;  Maybe the letter of the law doesn&#039;t require law enforcement to obtain warrants to get those records, but it should IMHO.  Less than 50 years ago, U.S. law didn&#039;t require cops to read people their rights either, but the ruling in &lt;i&gt;Miranda v. Arizona&lt;/i&gt; was a big step in the right direction and long overdue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe this is simplistic, but for me the answer seems to be &#8220;the law should be changed.&#8221;  Maybe the letter of the law doesn&#8217;t require law enforcement to obtain warrants to get those records, but it should IMHO.  Less than 50 years ago, U.S. law didn&#8217;t require cops to read people their rights either, but the ruling in <i>Miranda v. Arizona</i> was a big step in the right direction and long overdue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lance lunchmeat</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2009/02/24/dont-get-too-cocky-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-20804</link>
		<dc:creator>lance lunchmeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2009/02/24/dont-get-too-cocky-canada/#comment-20804</guid>
		<description>Am I supposed to read the title in Star Wolf&#039;s voice?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I supposed to read the title in Star Wolf&#8217;s voice?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bunnyofdoom</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2009/02/24/dont-get-too-cocky-canada/comment-page-1/#comment-20800</link>
		<dc:creator>bunnyofdoom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 13:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2009/02/24/dont-get-too-cocky-canada/#comment-20800</guid>
		<description>Okay, so cross this one off the list of why Canada is more awesome than the states. Well, that just leaves the other 3912 reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so cross this one off the list of why Canada is more awesome than the states. Well, that just leaves the other 3912 reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

