<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mightygodking.com &#187; TV</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mightygodking.com/index.php/category/tv/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mightygodking.com</link>
	<description>Christopher Bird writes about things.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 18:19:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>It was lupus all along</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/05/21/it-was-lupus-all-along/</link>
		<comments>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/05/21/it-was-lupus-all-along/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 21:14:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MGK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/?p=6249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My weekly TV column is up at Torontoist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://torontoist.com/2012/05/televisualist-upstairs-in-the-house/">weekly TV column</a> is up at Torontoist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/05/21/it-was-lupus-all-along/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grammar nerds can go to hell</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/05/14/grammar-nerds-can-go-to-hell/</link>
		<comments>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/05/14/grammar-nerds-can-go-to-hell/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 03:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MGK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/?p=6226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My weekly TV column is up at Torontoist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://torontoist.com/2012/05/televisualist-aiken-to-be-an-apprentice/">weekly TV column</a> is up at Torontoist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/05/14/grammar-nerds-can-go-to-hell/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Also ending this week: Last Man Standing, assuming you care about that</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/05/07/also-ending-this-week-last-man-standing-assuming-you-care-about-that/</link>
		<comments>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/05/07/also-ending-this-week-last-man-standing-assuming-you-care-about-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 03:52:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MGK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/?p=6199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My weekly TV column is up at Torontoist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://torontoist.com/2012/05/televisualist-week-of-things-ending/">weekly TV column</a> is up at Torontoist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/05/07/also-ending-this-week-last-man-standing-assuming-you-care-about-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>But how does Hawaii Five-O tie into the St. Elsewhereverse?</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/04/30/but-how-does-hawaii-five-o-tie-into-the-st-elsewhereverse/</link>
		<comments>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/04/30/but-how-does-hawaii-five-o-tie-into-the-st-elsewhereverse/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2012 02:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MGK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/?p=6170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My weekly TV column is up at Torontoist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://torontoist.com/2012/04/televisualist-a-high-functioning-sociopath/">weekly TV column</a> is up at Torontoist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/04/30/but-how-does-hawaii-five-o-tie-into-the-st-elsewhereverse/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ansaz, three</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/04/25/ansaz-three/</link>
		<comments>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/04/25/ansaz-three/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MGK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Canadian Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flicks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/?p=6161</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Black Mage: Does Thomas Mulcair have a good shot of winning the next Canadian election? Is it a better/worse shot than any of the other NDP contenders? I would say yes and I don&#8217;t know, respectively. I think Mulcair is perhaps better positioned to leech votes from the centre than any other of the NDP [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Black Mage:</b> <i>Does Thomas Mulcair have a good shot of winning the next Canadian election? Is it a better/worse shot than any of the other NDP contenders?</i></p>
<p>I would say yes and I don&#8217;t know, respectively. I think Mulcair is perhaps better positioned to leech votes from the centre than any other of the NDP candidates were and he&#8217;ll protect the new Quebec base, but the fact that he is from Quebec will be at least a slight negative in the West because they get incredibly pissy about that. I think on balance he was the best choice, not because he of geography or politics, but because he&#8217;s a political gut-punch fighter, and that&#8217;s what going to be necessary until the next election. But the NDP bench was really deep this time around (due in large part to Jack Layton making sure that it would be), so Mulcair is just the best of a strong lot.</p>
<p><b>supergp:</b> <i>If you were going to write a big comic crossover event, what would your premise be?</i></p>
<p>Old DC: Probably something involving most of the major heroes being mind-controlled with Starro or whatever and a few stragglers left to save the day. Probably including Empress, Major Disaster, and Geist the Twilight Man as some of the rebel fringe. (Yes, I know both MD and Geist were supposedly killed in <em>Infinite Crisis</em>. My answer to that is simple: &#8220;nuh-uh.&#8221;)</p>
<p>New DC: Something that brings back the old DC.</p>
<p>Marvel: Victor Von Doom. Infinity Gauntlet. <b>*drops mic*</b></p>
<p><b>JDR:</b> <i>Can you compare Canada to some country(ies) that aren’t the USA?</i></p>
<p>Well, we&#8217;re colder than Botswana, freer than Yemen, less blonde than Sweden, better at parking than Italy, have less Japanese people than Japan, have better McDonald&#8217;s than Australia, less jiggly at most times than Brazil, less shaky than Djibouti, less class-riddled than England, have more Tamils working as line cooks than Sri Lanka (seriously, in Toronto Tamils fill the same role that the various Central American immigrants do in American kitchens; one of my former roommates, a sous chef and thoroughly white dude, spoke decent Tamil), easier to pronounce than Kyrgyzstan, less desert-y than the Western Sahara, and our French bears only a slight resemblance to France&#8217;s French. How&#8217;s that?</p>
<p><b>Greg Morrow:</b> <i>What is the most important difference between the constitutional laws of Canada and the United States? Not the procedural stuff about how the legislature is constituted, but the substantive stuff about civil rights and limited government power.</i></p>
<p>Probably the existence of s.1 of the <em>Charter of Rights and Freedoms</em>, the limitations clause. (Which, for the uninitiated, allows the government to pass laws which limit individual rights, so long as those laws are relatively specific and enumerated and that the limitation is justifiable in a free and democratic society.) It prevents a lot of &#8220;this absolute principle is clashing with that other absolute principle&#8221; confusion that arises whenever rights collide with other rights, which actually happens just about all the time. Of course, I know more than a few Constititional scholars who absolutely loathe the existence of s.1, so who knows.</p>
<p><b>Der Whelk:</b> <i>Is there an old series or property out there you think deserves and would be a perfect for a big budget re-make?</i></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not so much a remake as it is a continuation or sequel or even logical endpoint: <em>Quantum Leap.</em> </p>
<p>You would still have Scott Bakula as Sam Beckett, clearly having aged in real time from the end of the show, leaping from life to life, his memories continually fogged, and you would still have Al traveling alongside him, guiding him in his tasks, and that would be the first quarter of the movie or so &#8211; maybe one or two quick leaps &#8211; and then Sam jumps into a timeframe he <em>shouldn&#8217;t</em> be able to jump into normally, a time well after his death would have occurred. Something has gone wrong in the quantum stream. Somebody is interfering. Al is completely panicked and Sam is at a loss.</p>
<p>And that&#8217;s when he meets a <em>second</em> Leaper &#8211; one Al recognizes, not that he can tell Sam this &#8211; and although Sam doesn&#8217;t quite understand it, suddenly they&#8217;re working together to do something he can&#8217;t quite understand. The three of them are now leaping together, and every time she reminds him of what&#8217;s been happening so he doesn&#8217;t lose track. She&#8217;s working with slightly more advanced technology than Sam is, but even her advances aren&#8217;t enough for her to do what she needs to do, so she has enlisted Sam&#8217;s help. Two Leapers, working in tandem across multiple times, can pull it off. There&#8217;s no other way.</p>
<p>What has happened? Thanks to the interference of the second Leaper (who is much younger than Sam), Sam has traveled into <i>her</i> timeline. This leaper dies much, much later than Sam will &#8211; a century or more later &#8211; and this means she and Sam, together, can effect the events necessary for a future Leaper to leap backwards and give her the technology she so desperately needs to return Sam home. And so the present changes the future changes the past changes the present&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;because Sam Beckett&#8217;s daughter wants her father back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/04/25/ansaz-three/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>34</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My big wedding gypsy fatness</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/04/23/my-big-wedding-gypsy-fatness/</link>
		<comments>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/04/23/my-big-wedding-gypsy-fatness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 23:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MGK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/?p=6155</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My weekly TV column is up at Torontoist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://torontoist.com/2012/04/televisualist-insert-nationality-here-gypsy-wedding/">weekly TV column</a> is up at Torontoist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/04/23/my-big-wedding-gypsy-fatness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Veeptastic</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/04/16/veeptastic/</link>
		<comments>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/04/16/veeptastic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MGK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/?p=6131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My weekly TV column is up at Torontoist. Also, that Married&#8230; With Children is 25 years old today makes me feel very old indeed.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://torontoist.com/2012/04/televisualist-twenty-five-years-of-fart-jokes/">weekly TV column</a> is up at Torontoist.</p>
<p>Also, that <em>Married&#8230; With Children</em> is 25 years old today makes me feel very old indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/04/16/veeptastic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Also, YEEAAAHHHHHHHH</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/04/02/also-yeeaaahhhhhhhh/</link>
		<comments>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/04/02/also-yeeaaahhhhhhhh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Apr 2012 02:50:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MGK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/?p=6095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My weekly TV column is up at Torontoist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://torontoist.com/2012/04/televisualist-yeeeeaaaaaaahhhhhhh/">weekly TV column</a> is up at Torontoist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/04/02/also-yeeaaahhhhhhhh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WrestleMania XXVIII Preview</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/03/31/wrestlemania-xxviii-preview/</link>
		<comments>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/03/31/wrestlemania-xxviii-preview/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2012 06:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jim Smith</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/?p=6086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve occasionally wondered if the MGK.com audience is interested in professional wrestling analysis, and I suppose there&#8217;s no better reason to test the waters than what Dave Meltzer calls &#8220;the biggest money-drawing pro-wrestling show of the last 130 years.&#8221;  (It is a little known fact that the Earp brothers and the Clanton gang actually settled [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve occasionally wondered if the MGK.com audience is interested in professional wrestling analysis, and I suppose there&#8217;s no better reason to test the waters than what Dave Meltzer calls &#8220;the biggest money-drawing pro-wrestling show of the last 130 years.&#8221;  (It is a little known fact that the Earp brothers and the Clanton gang <em>actually</em> settled their differences with a eight-man tag in front of a sellout crowd at the Tombstone Sportatorium.)</p>
<p>The sensibility that <em>WrestleMania</em> is a special show on the WWE calendar is somewhat artificial.  There&#8217;s no particular reason that WWE couldn&#8217;t save their biggest matches or their stadium events for, say, <em>SummerSlam</em> or <em>Survivor Series</em>.  But <em>WrestleMania</em> has an aura about it, primarily because of epic matches like Hulk Hogan vs. Andre the Giant (1987), Hogan vs. Ultimate Warrior (1990), the Rock vs. Steve Austin series (1999/2001/2003), Hogan vs. the Rock (2002) and Shawn Michaels vs. the Undertaker (2009-2010).  For <em>WrestleMania XXVIII</em>, WWE is poised to deliver the same kind of big-time, clash-of-the-titans feeling with a main event the company has been hyping since about a month before <em>WrestleMania XXVII</em>.  It&#8217;s just that big!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>John Cena vs. The Rock</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure the wrestling fandom has anticipated a match this much since Hogan and Andre.  For over a year I&#8217;ve heard serious discussion about whether fans in the Sun Life Stadium will riot if the Rock loses in his hometown.  There&#8217;s been tons of buildup for this one, as Rock and Cena have traded &#8220;is this a fake storyline or something more?&#8221; barbs at each other for years.  Ostensibly, the story is that Rock retired in 2004 to make movies, and now he feels like coming back but Cena resents that the &#8220;people&#8217;s champion&#8221; walked out on the people.  Recently the Rock has added the wrinkle that he wants to prove he&#8217;s the greatest of all time by becoming the only man to defeat Hulk Hogan, Steve Austin, and John Cena at <em>WrestleMania</em>.</p>
<p>The real story, though, is as follows:</p>
<ol>
<li>The Rock was one of the biggest stars of one of WWE&#8217;s hottest eras.</li>
<li>John Cena is one of the biggest stars of the last 7-8 years.</li>
<li>Hardcore wrestling fans can&#8217;t fucking stand John Cena and want to see him die.</li>
<li>But nobody ever really beats John Cena when it counts because he&#8217;s a big star.</li>
<li>But  the Rock is a <em>bigger</em> star, and if anyone can get the job done, it&#8217;s him.</li>
</ol>
<p>Basically, this match is every online Superman vs. Batman debate made manifest.  Up to and including the part where nobody notices that Batman is just Superman with a blue cape.</p>
<p><strong>Who will win? </strong> Let&#8217;s put it this way: WWE is hoping this will be the highest-grossing WrestleMania of all time, and very few people are paying to see the Rock <em>lose</em>.</p>
<p><strong>Who <em>should</em> win?</strong>  My personal WrestleMania experience would be perfect if I could hear millions of butthurt Cena-haters wailing as one on April 1, so I&#8217;m rooting for John Cena.</p>
<p><a id="more-6086"></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>WWE Champion CM Punk vs. Chris Jericho</strong></p>
<p>CM Punk was on the verge of quitting WWE last summer until his career was revitalized by a &#8220;everything else in wrestling is fake but this is really real&#8221; story, where he called WWE management stupid and threatened to win the top championship and take it with him out the door.  He is now well on his way to being one of the &#8220;made men&#8221; in the regular roster.  Because Cena vs. Rock and HHH vs. Taker are on this show, the WWE title match is at best a distant third in terms of drawing money.  This match can&#8217;t be about being the biggest star, so it&#8217;s about who is the best wrestler.  Punk thinks he is, Jericho thinks he is, they will fight to find out.</p>
<p>The storyline has been a bit muddied in the home stretch by a series of promos in which Jericho tried to get under Punk&#8217;s skin with allegations about his family.  The promos themselves didn&#8217;t work too well on me, but Punk&#8217;s reactions were excellent.  I firmly want to believe that the next time Punk sees Jericho, he will break bones.  And the next time they&#8217;ll see each other will be in the ring on Sunday.</p>
<p><strong>Who will win?</strong>  Conventional wisdom is that this is only the first bout in a series, and that the smart move would be to have Jericho win the championship so that Punk can win it back at the next show in his native Chicago.  But &#8220;WWE&#8221; and &#8220;conventional wisdom&#8221; don&#8217;t go together very well, so I&#8217;m predicting Punk.</p>
<p><strong>Who <em>should</em> win? </strong> Punk.  He&#8217;s only held the title for 132 days, and I&#8217;m a big believer that wrestling title reigns should generally last longer than that.  There&#8217;s no sense in having Jericho win the belt just to lose it back to Punk in a month, so I say keep it where it is.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Randy Orton vs. Kane</strong></p>
<p>This is the battle of two sociopaths who love inflicting pain and being as boring as possible.  I believe both of them made speeches in 2011 about rededicating themselves to remorseless cruelty, and if you read me the transcripts I probably couldn&#8217;t tell them apart.  Picture Kane going for a chokeslam, Orton reversing it into an RKO neckbreaker, and Kane reversing that into another chokeslam.  For nine minutes.  That is what I expect to see.</p>
<p><strong>Who will win?</strong>  Orton.</p>
<p><strong>Who <em>should</em> win?</strong>  Both maimed and killed.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>David Otunga (captain), Mark Henry, Dolph Ziggler, Jack Swagger, The Miz, &amp; Drew McIntyre<br />
(w/John Laurinaitis, Vickie Guerrero, and Brie Bella)<br />
vs.<br />
Santino Marella (captain), Kofi Kingston, R-Truth, Zack Ryder, Booker T, &amp; The Great Khali<br />
(w/Teddy Long, Aksana, Hornswaggle, and Nikki Bella)</strong></p>
<p>In case you can&#8217;t tell, WWE likes to cram as many of the performers onto the <em>WrestleMania</em> card as possible.</p>
<p>Since 2002 WWE has divided its roster into two &#8220;brands&#8221; named for its flagship <em>Monday Night Raw</em> and <em>Friday Night Smackdown</em> programs.  Laurinatis and Long are the general managers of the two brands, and lately they&#8217;ve been a-feudin&#8217; so this match is to decide which of them takes the other&#8217;s job and becomes the GM of both brands.</p>
<p>This match tells you everything you need to know about WWE&#8217;s midcard.  The bad guy team is largely made up of former world champions and/or &#8220;next big things&#8221; that haven&#8217;t lived up to their hype.  The good guy team is a bunch of losers booked as comedy goofball acts that couldn&#8217;t win a world thumb wrestling championship.  The characters in this match that WWE has invested the most effort into promoting are the non-wrestlers&#8211;the aging executives and the shrill managers and the hot chicks and the leprechaun.  If you&#8217;ve been noticing lately that WWE builds <em>WrestleMania</em> around retired superstars, this is why.</p>
<p><strong>Who will win?</strong>  I expect Laurinaitis will become GM of both shows and Teddy will stay on TV as his butler or something until the next big power play storyline.</p>
<p><strong>Who <em>should</em> win?</strong>  Ideally, Mark Henry would get pissed at his team and clubber them all, because Mark Henry is awesome and does not get to split enough wigs.  Then in the confusion Zack Ryder would score the pinfall for his big <em>WrestleMania</em> moment, ensuring that I get Teddy Long twice a week and John Laurinaitis zero-ice a week.  Holla holla!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Brodus Clay squashes some guy</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left"><a href="http://youtu.be/SQ9u1-yJG0Q">Funk is on a roll / Funk is on a roll / Hey hey hey yo! /  Can somebody call my momma / It&#8217;s about to get funky up in here! / Somebody call my momma / Somebody call my momma / Somebody call my momma / Will somebody please call my mom!</a></p>
<p style="text-align: left"><strong>Who will win?</strong>  &#8220;SHOULD I HIT HIM?&#8221;</p>
<p style="text-align: left"><strong>Who <em>should</em> win?</strong> Yes you should, Funkasaurus.</p>
<p style="text-align: left">
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>WWE Divas Champion Beth Phoenix &amp; Eve Torres vs. Kelly Kelly &amp; Maria Menounos</strong></p>
<p>I have nothing against women&#8217;s wrestling, but WWE management could not give a shit less about it, so women&#8217;s wrestling in WWE is always a meaningless affair where the bookers don&#8217;t try and the performers aren&#8217;t given enough time and the audience has been trained not to care.  Maria Menounos is the host of <em>Extra</em> or something, and she is in this match because she is so famous I had to look up what she is famous for.  I gather that Menounous legitimately broke a couple of ribs this week and I still haven&#8217;t heard that she&#8217;s been pulled out of this match, so more power to her.  But this is still going to be the official piss break.</p>
<p><strong>Who will win?</strong>  Usually the team with the celebrity wins, but I figure the bad guys win instead, and then the good guys get revenge after the match.  Perhaps someone&#8217;s pants will be pulled down!  Ho ho ho!</p>
<p><strong>Who <em>should</em> win?</strong>  I think Phoenix&#8217;s arms are bigger than Menounous&#8217;s thighs, so she really ought to be snapping the good guys like twigs here.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>World Heavyweight Champion Daniel Bryan (w/AJ Lee) vs. Sheamus</strong></p>
<p>An explanation for the uninitiated: WWE actually has two world titles, the WWE championship and the World Heavyweight championship.  So CM Punk is the world champion of WWE, and Daniel Bryan is WWE&#8217;s champion of the world.  Does that make sense?  Because if it does, you have my have a promising future in the world of sports entertainment.</p>
<p>Daniel Bryan is the traditional chickenshit heel, who won  the title via dishonest chicanery and has since defended it mainly by running away and/or hiding behind his girlfriend.  I have to give major props to Byran and AJ for becoming the comic book nerd version of Randy Savage and Miss Elizabeth&#8211;he has this beautiful manager, he treats her like dirt, fanboys everywhere are in love with her.  Now, once and for all, there will be no running, because it&#8217;s <em>WrestleMania</em> and stuff!</p>
<p>Sheamus won the right to challenge for this title by winning the 2012 Royal Rumble.  It seems weird to write that, because for 20 years winning the Royal Rumble and challenging the (a) champion at <em>WrestleMania</em> was a really big deal, a storyline attached to the top match of the show.  Obviously this year Daniel Bryan vs. Sheamus wasn&#8217;t going to be Bret Hart vs. Shawn Michaels or Kurt Angle vs. Brock Lesnar, but that doesn&#8217;t mean they couldn&#8217;t try to make it feel like it could have been the biggest match of a different card.  As it is, this has been promoted like it&#8217;s the main event of a <em>Smackdown</em> TV taping, and not even during sweeps.  Nevertheless, I like both guys and I&#8217;m still hoping it&#8217;ll be good.  I just wish WWE was paying as much attention as I will be.</p>
<p><strong>Who will win?</strong>  Sheamus, unless WWE realizes they&#8217;re onto something with Bryan&#8217;s character.</p>
<p><strong>Who <em>should</em> win?</strong>  Unless they&#8217;re willing to commit to a 600-day reign of terror for Bryan, and I don&#8217;t think they are, now&#8217;s the right time for somebody to end his run, and Sheamus is the guy to do it.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>WWE Intercontinental Champion Cody Rhodes vs. the Big Show</strong></p>
<p>The story to this match is that Cody is a dick and he keeps rubbing it in that Big Show always chokes at <em>WrestleMania</em>.  Except for 2006.  And 2010.  And, uh, last year.  Wrestling is not very good at history or stats.</p>
<p><strong>Who will win?</strong>  The unwritten rules say that you don&#8217;t put the intercontinental title on a great big guy, so I&#8217;m thinking Cody goes over here.</p>
<p><strong>Who <em>should</em> win?</strong>  Cody is rightfully the greatest wrestler in all non-insular landmasses.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>WWE Tag Team Champions Primo &amp; Epico Colon (w/Rosa Mendes) vs. Jimmy &amp; Jey Uso vs. Tyson Kidd &amp; Justin Gabriel</strong></p>
<p>This match is scheduled to be broadcast for free on YouTube, so that tells you how important the tag titles are these days.  I don&#8217;t know if Gabriel and Kidd are faces or heels&#8211;last time I looked, they were one of each, which goes to show how much time these jobbers get on TV.</p>
<p><strong>Who will win? </strong> I don&#8217;t think WWE cares enough to do anything but stand pat, so the Colons retain the tag belts.</p>
<p><strong>Who <em>should</em> win? </strong> If they&#8217;re giving this match away free to entice late PPV buys, I&#8217;d put the belts on the Usos to get people&#8217;s attention.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Hell in a Cell (w/special referee Shawn Michaels)<br />
The Undertaker vs. Triple H</strong></p>
<p>This is a rematch from last year, but it&#8217;s also carrying on themes from the three <em>Manias</em> before it.  After Shawn Michaels retired his friend and idol Ric Flair at XXIV, he became obsessed with being the first man to defeat the Undertaker at <em>WrestleMania</em>, to the point that he put his career at stake and lost at XXVI.  Going into the HHH/Taker match at XXVII, it was very much about Hunter avenging Shawn and also following Shawn into the same mid-life crisis of having no worlds left to conquer.  The match itself shifted the focus to Taker&#8217;s career being in a crossroads, as Triple H beat him within an inch of his life and left him struggling to continue like Flair at XXIV.  The finish was perfect, as HHH very nearly beat Taker but for one mistake, but only Hunter was able to walk away from the fight.   One year later, they both have to fight again, and the Hell in a Cell cage is there to make sure it&#8217;ll be the last time.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s a lot of symbolism in this match that makes it special.  Triple H is a wrestling veteran in his early forties, entering a phase of his career where the only real challenge is staving off death itself.  His instincts are to continue like he did in his youth, but against Undertaker that&#8217;s tempting fate, and if he&#8217;s not careful he&#8217;ll end up like Shawn&#8211;a regretful shadow of his former self.  Whereas Triple H can&#8217;t be the Cerebral Assassin forever, Undertaker can always be the Dead Man, but the Dead Man can&#8217;t always be a world-class wrestler.  He got destroyed last year, to the point where I was watching at home wondering if he had sustained brain damage, and all the urns and druids and caskets in the world weren&#8217;t going to save him.  So for him this match is about proving he&#8217;s still relevant professionally, against the greatest professional left in the industry.  Triple H is an aging man who needs to prove there&#8217;s life after death; Undertaker is an old god who needs to prove men haven&#8217;t moved beyond him.</p>
<p>You can probably tell I&#8217;m really stoked for this match.  <em>WrestleMania XXVII</em> really would have sucked a turd if it hadn&#8217;t been for the HHH/Taker match, so I&#8217;m counting on the rematch to make this year&#8217;s show a can&#8217;t-miss proposition.</p>
<p><strong>Who will win?</strong>  As time goes by I&#8217;m more and more certain that Undertaker&#8217;s streak&#8211;and his career&#8211;is on borrowed time, and sooner or later we&#8217;ll see him go down for the count and not get up.  But this isn&#8217;t the year to do it.  Undertaker extends the streak to 20-0, semi-retires Triple H, and returns next year for his next victim.</p>
<p><strong>Who <em>should</em> win?</strong>  My head says Taker <em>ought</em> to win, but I for the last three or four years I&#8217;ve rooted against the streak, if only because I want to say I saw it die.  19-1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/03/31/wrestlemania-xxviii-preview/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>38</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Margaery Tyrell is seriously awesome, you guys</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/03/26/margaery-tyrell-is-seriously-awesome-you-guys/</link>
		<comments>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/03/26/margaery-tyrell-is-seriously-awesome-you-guys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2012 23:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MGK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/?p=6077</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My weekly TV column is up at Torontoist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://torontoist.com/2012/03/televisualist-throne-soup/">weekly TV column</a> is up at Torontoist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/03/26/margaery-tyrell-is-seriously-awesome-you-guys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Urkel will be victorious, I&#8217;m telling you</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/03/19/urkel-will-be-victorious-im-telling-you/</link>
		<comments>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/03/19/urkel-will-be-victorious-im-telling-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MGK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/?p=6059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My weekly TV column is up at Torontoist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://torontoist.com/2012/03/televisualist-cruel-to-be-kind/">weekly TV column</a> is up at Torontoist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/03/19/urkel-will-be-victorious-im-telling-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Colton really is just that bad, y&#8217;all</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/03/12/colton-really-is-just-that-bad-yall/</link>
		<comments>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/03/12/colton-really-is-just-that-bad-yall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2012 19:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MGK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/?p=6044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My weekly TV column is up at Torontoist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://torontoist.com/2012/03/televisualist-human-garbage/">weekly TV column</a> is up at Torontoist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/03/12/colton-really-is-just-that-bad-yall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Also, too</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/03/05/also-too/</link>
		<comments>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/03/05/also-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2012 20:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MGK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/?p=6024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My weekly TV column is up at Torontoist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://torontoist.com/2012/03/televisualist-i-can-see-russia-from-my-house/">weekly TV column</a> is up at Torontoist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/03/05/also-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Or maybe a Ned Nederlander joke</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/02/27/or-maybe-a-ned-nederlander-joke/</link>
		<comments>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/02/27/or-maybe-a-ned-nederlander-joke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 18:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MGK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/?p=6006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My weekly TV column is up at Torontoist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://torontoist.com/2012/02/televisualist-short-on-talent/">weekly TV column</a> is up at Torontoist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/02/27/or-maybe-a-ned-nederlander-joke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anne Hathaway is still cool though</title>
		<link>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/02/20/anne-hathaway-is-still-cool-though/</link>
		<comments>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/02/20/anne-hathaway-is-still-cool-though/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2012 20:32:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>MGK</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[The Internets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mightygodking.com/?p=5948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My weekly TV column is up at Torontoist.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://torontoist.com/2012/02/televisualist-begone-james-franco-begone/">weekly TV column</a> is up at Torontoist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mightygodking.com/index.php/2012/02/20/anne-hathaway-is-still-cool-though/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

