26 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif

Sounds worth seeing. Have to get on that some time very soon.

(You seen Moon yet? Pretty good. Not a bad summer for movies, all in all.)

ReplyReply
mygif

Really? Because its ad campaign: “A movie about the two types of people in the world: men and women” is such a hoary cliche that I figured they couldn’t be selling anything good with it.

ReplyReply
mygif
Patrick C. said on July 23rd, 2009 at 5:08 pm

If nothing else, it has the one flaw of that absolutely excruciating elevator conversation about the Smiths that appears in the trailer.

That scene alone concerns me that it’s going to be too self-conscious by half.

ReplyReply
mygif

Shut up, really?

ReplyReply
mygif

It’s what MGK said. I saw it on a date, and when back the next day to just drown in its perfect everything.

So damn good.

ReplyReply
mygif

Anyone who uses ‘Tropes’ to apply to ANYTHING in the real world deserves to be taken out and bloody eviscerated.

The grouping of things into tropes is the enemy of good writing. Hell, it’s the enemy of good entertainment.

ReplyReply
mygif

The words of Stig are true.

ReplyReply
mygif

But Stig, we wouldn’t have TVTropes.org if we didn’t.

ReplyReply
mygif

Gosh, it’s been so long… What was the last line of The Apartment?

Best last lines:
-Some Like It Hot
-Casablanca
-King Kong

ReplyReply
mygif

I thought Annie Hall was a postmodern take on Annie Hall.

ReplyReply
mygif

if memory serves: “shut up and deal”
which is cool, though i admit not getting the whole “best final line in the history of film” thing (not a critique, it’s probably just one of those things were i’m probably not trained/artistic enogh to get). If anyone could enlighten me, i’ll be more than greatful

ReplyReply
mygif

i wish that the boy was a little more queer and the girl less conveniently bisexual. but yes. v. v. good.

ReplyReply
mygif

Wow. Stunning bit of homophobia out of left fucking field.

ReplyReply
mygif

Canadave, that website is a compilation of uninteresting, uninformative, unfunny twitterings of teats with nothing better to do. It’s akin to the pointless task of elderly Peter Stillman in Paul Auster’s “City Of Glass”, who spends his days making up a new language which only he can understand nobody else ever gets to hear. It breeds people like the Newsarama poster, Herald, who is in all truth the nearest real incarnation of Superboy Prime on Earth. And it’s an intellectually bankrupt way of enjoying and criticising something compared to…actually experiencing and enjoying it.

Bottom line is, I worked like a fucking mule to finish my English Lit A-Levels and get a chance to do a degree in Comparative Literature, and I don’t like the idea of a bunch of barely-coherent nerds thinking they can do better because they noticed a similar plot between two shitty anime series.

Anyway – MGK, I dare you to say the film is better than Before Sunrise & Before Sunset. Because it is not, and in no way could be, and I very rarely see you lying on this blog.

ReplyReply
mygif
Mark Temporis said on July 24th, 2009 at 5:18 am

Hey! I actually DO spend my days making up a language that nobody (well, certain members of my RPG group, but really—4 or 5 people) gets to hear!

Handy for passwords actually, but I have no particular need for security since I can’t do e-commerce.

ReplyReply
mygif

Anyway – MGK, I dare you to say the film is better than Before Sunrise & Before Sunset.

It’s better than either film individually. I’d have to see it at least once or twice more before deciding whether it’s better than the two combined.

Of course, ranking a pair of films like Summer and either Before is an exercise in nigh-futility; Summer is a highly stylized work that frequently plays with the ideas of being a movie itself, and either Before is more like a short story that just happened to occur in front of a camera. They’re at completely opposite ends of the creative spectrum.

ReplyReply
mygif

You’re right – in fact, to further my above point, even the simple process of ranking one film or book or play against another damages your perception of it, because they were made at different times in different ways.

ReplyReply
mygif

Although you’ll note that all three benefit from having extraordinary lead female performers – both Delpy and Deschanel benefit from not only being maddeningly pretty but also maddeningly intelligent, especially by the standard of modern film actresses.

ReplyReply
mygif

Stig: I get where you’re coming from, but I always felt that site was just fluffy, tongue in cheek analysis of mainly pop culture things, who never took itself too serious. Though I admit to be somewhat irked once in a while, basically whenever I read an entry of someone trying to explain with the same tools fit for sci-fi series, Japanese fiction and videogame plots, things that shouldn’t (from the top of my head I can only remember a maddening entry on Hector Mann from “The Book of Illusions”). But when the site maintains its focus on the things it should, it can be good fun (and a huge time waster).

ReplyReply
mygif

actually, my comment was not homophobic at all, but seeking for more sexual freedom for all. opposite of it.

ReplyReply
mygif
RobotKeaton said on July 24th, 2009 at 2:08 pm

TVtropes is all in good fun. I don’t feel that the tropes contributors are looking down on their subjects.

Hell, the front page says “We are here to recognize tropes and play with them, not to make fun of them.”

ReplyReply
mygif

Tv tropes are just that: tools in the TV writer’s toolbox. When you are putting out between 20 and 30 scripts a year, even the best writing team is going to fall back on cliche and reliable, if not overly creative, story elements.

Good shows are the ones who manage to make those tired elements seem fresh by putting their own spin on them, or having interesting enough characters that you don’t care.

As a writer, it can be very useful to be able to analyse a work and “break it apart” as it were, and see where the author used narrative devices and tropes to good effect, and where they failed.

ReplyReply
mygif

I don’t think tvtropes actually considers itself an actual authority on literature, at least I don’t see that way. I was amused that all ‘tropes’ I noticed as a child were noticed by other people (egotism!)

I do love the site, because I find it fascinating how so many people use the same ideas, and how differently they apply them. How someone screws it up, and how another makes it work for them. It’s like a list of creativity categorized for me, and I adore creativity. Intellectually bankrupt or no, it makes me happy to see so many ideas being used.

ReplyReply
mygif
candlejack said on July 27th, 2009 at 1:31 am

> “even the simple process of ranking one film or book or play against another damages your perception of it, because they were made at different times in different ways”

You needed a Comparative Lit degree to come to the conclusion that different works are different? *grin*

ReplyReply
mygif
Patrick C. said on July 27th, 2009 at 4:53 pm

Okay, actually saw it, and it is in fact very good and insanely resonant. And the Smiths bit is better in context.

BUT.

The little girl that Joseph Gordon-Levitt talks with throughout the movie feels like something from Quirky Indie Cliches 101. So unexplained and inexplicable is she that I was inclined to think her a figment of Tom’s imagination, until my date pointed out that she interacted with other characters in the first scene of the movie.

ReplyReply
mygif
Magic Love Hose said on August 18th, 2009 at 10:17 pm

MGK wasn’t kidding. He might even have undersold it.

If I had to summarize the movie in one scene, it’d be the scene where he just got laid, and it’s the greatest “I just got laid” sequence in film, beating the 40 Year Old Virgin by a mile. And then, the very next scene, several hundred days later he emerges from the elevator dead to life. The whiplash-inducing juxtaposition communicates the movie’s theme perfectly to me. In my relationships there are days I think the other person walks on water and days when I want to shoot them into the sun. I’ve never seen a movie communicate this so well.

He’s not kidding about the last line, either.

ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please Note: Comment moderation may be active so there is no need to resubmit your comments