8:39: I really shouldn’t be watching this on CNN, but they have so many gadgets. A countdown clock! A group of undecided voters! (Who, interestingly, think Obama will win the debate 70-30 before it even starts, thus rendering “undecided voter” even closer than ever to “dumbass.”) A group of “analysts” who will score McCain and Obama on how well they hit “opportunities,” thus rendering the actual substance of the debate exactly as important as CNN thinks it is, which is not very much at all!
8:43: Wolf Blitzer is another one of those people who really, really needs to be punched in the face.
8:48: The guy who looks like Mr. Potato Head says that McCain has a huge advantage because he has a good sense of humour, right after marveling how amazing it is that the candidates will have to speak for five minutes at a time – why, it’s nearly as strenuous as a high school forensics competition!
8:50: Actually I think I would like to punch CNN’s entire political team in the face. Maybe not Campbell Brown, she is pretty and occasionally says things that are not stupid. But the rest of them, yes.
8:55: To “set the scene” CNN has established that a debate party supporting Obama is full of black people, where a debate party supporting McCain is full of white people. JURMALISM!
8:56: However, on the bright side, everybody seems to agree that John McCain is a master debater while Obama cannot string two words together in a debate context. Nothing like setting the bars of expectation where Obama wants them. (I am not being sarcastic.)
8:58: Ted Kennedy: still not dead.
9:00: Jim Lehrer, staring at the screen, dead-eyed. YES THIS IS TELEVISION AT ITS MOST GRIPPING. Debate rules! Who doesn’t love debate rules! The audience isn’t allowed to cheer except when Obama and McCain show up, and then again when they leave, and are allowed one “woo” if either Obama or McCain busts a particularly funky move.
9:03: Financial crisis question and the bailout plan. Do you support the bailout plan, Senator Obama? Wall Street is not Main Street. He goes through his points as to what he expects from any bailout plan. The lines say the people like his points. However, in a shocking bit of news, Republicans do not like it when he blames George Bush.
9:06: John McCain sends out his props to Kennedy, whom he calls “T-Dog.” No, I just made that up. The crisis is very bad. It’s bad. It’s so bad. People will lose jobs, that’s how bad it is. If you notice I am not being specific here, there is a reason for that. And finally, let’s eliminate our dependence on foreign oil.
9:08: Do you favor the plan specifically, then, guys? Obama explains how he has been mostly right all along, and finally says “yes, we have to intervene,” but then comes out for more regulation. The lines seem to like his regulation. John McCain talks about Dwight Eisenhower, then says we need to hold people accountable, and says he got criticized for calling for the resignation of Chris Cox, which is, you know, not true, because McCain said he would fire Cox, which, like, the President can’t do.
9:12: Jim Lehrer wants them to talk to each other. Obama keeps it classy and doesn’t go for the gutshot on McCain. The lines like him. They dip down for McCain when he starts talking about, you know, nothing. McCain then again calls the USA the greatest “exporter and importer,” which A) it isn’t and B) so what if it was.
9:14: McCain starts talking about government spending being out of control aaaaand yes he’s talking about earmarks, linking corruption to earmarks (what?) and attacks Obama for earmark spending. Okay, first test here: can Obama really kick McCain in the nuts over this?
9:16: Obama admits that earmarks are bothersome, but then points out BASIC MATH! In a presidential debate! Who would’ve thunk. Talks up his tax plan, which makes the lines go SUPER HAPPY. McCain attacks Obama about earmarks some more then ignores the basic math and goes back to the corruption argument, then complains that Obama is asking for eleventy billion dollars in new spending – and Obama interrupts and reiterates, again, that earmarks alone aren’t going to do nearly enough to balance the budget.
9:20: Jim Lehrer ORDERS McCain to respond to Obama about tax policy. McCain starts talking about business flight (which is a fair point), then starts talking about earmarks AGAIN. Jesus Christ. Obama again points out his tax plan defines “rich” as “more than $250K per year” – and then mentions that McCain wants to tax health benefits. The lines mostly like that.
9:23: McCain again talks about earmark spending. This really is all he’s got.
9:26: Shifting back to the bailout again. What will they give up for the $700 billion? Obama says he’s not willing to give up energy independence and defines it as a priority. Second, fixing the healthcare system. The lines are INSANELY in favor of this. Third, competing on science and education. Fourth, rebuilding national infrastructure. (This is not quite so popular, probably because it’s a little less tangible.)
9:28: McCain wants to cut spending. Obama is super-liberal, you know! He says he’d cut ethanol subsidies (well, he’s not winning Iowa anyway, so that’s safe). He’ll cut fixed-cost military contracts! (That’ll pay for Iraq!)
9:30: Jim Lehrer says “wait, what will you cut?” Obama: portions of the energy independence program that might be more expensive than anticipated; healthcare subsidies to insurance companies via Medicare (this is popular). Obama says he’s so liberal because he opposes Bush’s policies (big Dem spike). Points out that he and Tom Coburn put together “Google for government.”
9:32: McCain: spending freeze on everything except defense (go figure). Obama: a spending freeze is dumbassed when you want more efficient government. (Paraphrased.) McCain: we spend $700 billion a year on energy independence and it has to include oil drilling and nuclear power. He starts jacking off some more about nuclear power.
9:34: Jim Lehrer: “please just admit that the financial bailout is going to make life tough for you. Please.” Almost begging. Obama admits it, then attacks McCain’s tax cuts for the rich. McCain attacks socialized medicine, because he has been on it all his life. Whoops! Then he again demands less government spending and less taxes.
9:38: McCain says “I’m not the Miss Congeniality of the Senate” for the second time. I suspect we will need a count on this one.
9:39: What are the lessons of Iraq? McCain: “I was right all along, you know. I was right in 2003, and then I was right about the surge, and I was right about everything else. In summary: I am right.”
9:40: The consequences of defeat in Iraq would have been: greater sectarian violence and expanded influence from Iran. (Wait, didn’t that happen?)
9:41: Obama: the lesson of Iraq is that it was a stupid fucking idea, and maybe we shouldn’t do stupid fucking things. Oh, and Iraq is costing the USA a shitload of money, and we didn’t get Osama, so let’s hear it for not being fucking stupid.
9:43: McCain: I was right I was right I was right. Lines are more or less okay for this, but they aren’t spiking nearly that high as Obama spiked.
9:45: Obama: The surge was a desperate attempt to contain four years of fuckups. Hey, John, were you right about the war being “quick and easy?” (Republicans, surprisingly, not pissed about this at all.) McCain: Obama is a dumbass and I went to Iraq. Independent voter lines are SAGGING.
9:47: McCain lays out the Little Golden Reader Book version of how you occupy a country peacefully as if it was somehow relevant. And then lies about Obama being willing to support troops, which Obama calls him on.
9:48: McCain has the WEIRDEST grin on his face. I think he’s starting to get pissed off.
9:50: Afghanistan! More troops, says Obama! Slams Iraq again for being a strategic mistake. And starts talking about having to deal with Pakistan, which the lines like, because Pakistan is inherently anti-line.
9:53: McCain attacks Obama for talking about having to deal with Pakistan and… is McCain saying the US needs to occupy Afghanistan in the same manner as Iraq? The lines like him, but… that’s a major commitment he just made right there.
9:56: Obama notes that John “Bomb bomb bomb Iran” McCain has no ground to say shit about people not being properly diplomatic.
9:57: McCain really loves Reagan! But not so much that he voted for marines going into Lebanon in 1983. Now he’s talking about some town hall meeting where some dead soldier’s mother gave him a bracelet and that the mission in Iraq must not be in vain and the United States can’t lose.
10:00: OBAMA HAS A BRACELET TOO! And his bracelet is all anti-war! BRACELET WARS!
10:02: McCain bitches out Obama for not going to Afghanistan, because McCain has BEEN THERE you know. He knows all the poppy shepherds by name.
10:03: It’s Iran time! McCain thinks if Iran gets nukes it’s very bad for Israel and all the other countries in the world. He says that Obama isn’t willing to call Iran bad guys to their faces.
10:06: Obama is willing to call the Iranian Republican Guard a terrorist organization (…yay?) and says that Iran can’t get nukes. This is mostly like saying water is wet, unless you are Iran.
10:08: McCain attacks Obama for being willing to talk to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad without preconditions and meet him in person and “legitimize” him. Obama points out that the big M-A isn’t even the most powerful man in Iran, and says he’s not afraid to meet with anybody if he thinks it’ll make America safe. The lines like that. Then points out that Henry Kissinger, a McCain advisor (and isn’t THAT a coup for McCain, he said sarcastically) is willing to meet unconditionally with bad people and in fact has done such things.
10:11: OH SNAP, it’s the “even Bush is doing what I think we should do” argument. And now Obama is going to the North Korea well, which given that it’s the biggest foreign policy fuckup of the Bush terms, is a good deep well for him. McCain looks really, really pissy.
10:12: OH SNAP AGAIN Obama pulled out the Spain attack!
10:13: McCain again going with “preconditions,” the lack of which he hates nearly so much as he does earmarks. I bet he’d really hate earmarks WITHOUT PRECONDITIONS! He also points out that North Korea is bad.
10:15: McCain has a weird grin on his face again. “Lemme get this straight, we sit down with Ahmadinejad, he says he wants to kill Israel, and we say “no you won’t?” …er, yes?
10:16: RUSSIA! The great bear! The giant bowl of borscht! Talks about defending the Eastern Bloc countries because they are members of NATO, says that Ukraine and Georgia can join NATO if they can manage the requirements. Also says that we can’t have a Cold War position with Russia, because that is, you know, INSANE. The lines really like this.
10:18: McCain’s turn, and he’s gonna attack Obama for being naive about Russia – and the lines are DROPPING. McCain is sure that we are not going to go back to the Cold War. Presumably because he wants to fight a hot one.
10:20: The lines are back up for McCain talking about Georgia and the Eastern Bloc supporting them. McCain has been to Georgia, you know! But generally he sounds like he knows what he’s talking about, which is impressive given that McCain is a doddering old fart. The lines reflect him sounding competent.
10:22: Obama ties Russia’s power to petrodollars and the need for America to become energy independent. Lines start going up in anticipation of his argument, and then points out more BASIC MATH by talking about how small America’s domestic oil supplies in fact are.
10:24: John McCain is sniffing loudly for some reason. It is very audible. He then lies some more about offshore drilling about how it will help on price. Obama really, REALLY wants to respond to this. He tries, but McCain starts talking over him.
10:26: Will the USA see another 9/11? McCain doesn’t think so! Because he worked with Joe Lieberman (gag). And then he says that he doesn’t want torture, which is some of the rankest bullshit he has yet spewed tonight.
10:28: Obama thinks the USA is safer too, but says there’s way more to do in terms of port control and how nuclear proliferation is incredibly important. He talks up missile defense (sigh) in terms of North Korea (which is the only likely thing missile defense can feasibly protect the USA from, so, well, that’s something I guess) but restates the need to stop proliferation, and then points out basically that he’s popular and the world likes him and that’s not nothing. And then he congratulates McCain’s shitty hypocritical record on torture. Christ, Barack!
10:31: McCain brings back nuclear proliferation to… Iraq? WHAT. THE. FUCK. The lines are mostly sharing my what-the-fuckness.
10:33: Obama basically says “yeah, Iraq, whatever, we owe China our kitchen sink plus the kitchen, that’s way worse.” Which is mostly true. Talks about the need for economic strength again, which the lines LOVE. Talks about veteran funding and how it’s important, and basically implies that John McCain has Iraq-based tunnel vision.
10:34: HOLY SHIT JOHN MCCAIN IS COMPARING OBAMA TO BUSH. The lines are notably not with him on this. Then he talks about how he loves veterans, except when there’s a GI Bill to vote for. Oh, wait, not that last part.
10:36: Obama: “My father came from Kenya.” Reeeeeeeeeeaaallly.
10:37: “When I came home from prison…” POW POW POW POW POW. And that ends the debate.
Final thoughts: McCain spent most of the debate looking to score a zinger. Obama spent most of it looking intelligent. I think Obama wins on points, but not a knockout punch. But, remember – this was the foreign policy debate. This was where McCain was arguably strongest, and I don’t even think he managed a tie – and the lines agree with me.
Related Articles
43 users responded in this post
*refresh* *refresh* *refresh*
I’m gonna wear the paint off the F5 key over the next 90 minutes.
McCain isn’t kidding, he really doesn’t like earmarks. I think that they are his mortal enemy, and he wants to eat their children.
The earmark that killed his parents was never found, and soon after, a young lad made a grim promise…
“I swear I’ll dedicate my life and inheritance to bringing earmarks to justice…and to fighting all porkbarrel spending! I swear it!”
The years passed as John McCain prepared for his chosen career!
Is it me are all the line really high when Obama speaks and are they really low when McCain speaks?
Nothing says “Busted” like someone willing to call you on years of BULLSHIT.
BLING WAR
What is with the Spooky Voice when talking about Iran?
The lines actually add to this liveblogging a dimension I’m not finding in the other liveblogs (and this is the most liveblogged event I’ve seen and I’m going to stop using derivations of that word because I think I’m making William Safire seasick somewhere.)
I just can’t watch it. I feel uncomfortable in that same way that I get when I see the old Orson Welles wine ads.
Calling the Iranian guard a terrorist organization is like saying that the CIA is. It is meaningless but apparently something that has to be done in the current political environment.
Parse: I do not think this word means what you think it means.
Also, doesn’t “precondition” have a specific semantic function — logic/programming — and shouldn’t “condition” be used instead in the contexts we’re seeing tonight?
F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5 F5!
Is anyone else seeing Joker mouth tics from John McCain?
Look how much McCain is blinking. Many experts on the subject claim that rapid blinking is a sign of a person who is not only lying but knows they are lying.
He stops blinking when he makes certain statements about what he believes.
Not that Obama isn’t blinking himself. Just McCain’s eyes are going mad.
Not an absolute win for Obama, but a solid performance, and McCain struggled at times. I think the thing is, McCain continually threw out bullshit and kept slinging accusations at Obama, and Obama wasn’t logistically capable of addressing every single one, so he got tagged more than he should. But he stayed on message, at least.
Did the FOX News commentators watch the same debate? Or is this more of their inability to be objective news reporters?
Obama kept laying out intelligent policies while McCain kept laying out stupid attacks. Obama didn’t do as well as I’d hoped.
The earmark that killed his parents was never found, and soon after, a young lad made a grim promise…
“I swear I’ll dedicate my life and inheritance to bringing earmarks to justice…and to fighting all porkbarrel spending! I swear it!”
The years passed as John McCain prepared for his chosen career!
Oh, GOD.
Now I’m imagining SimMcCain moving in with GoddamnBatman.
*whimper*
This was amazing. Could you do this for every debate? Wow.
@Stark: “Did the FOX News commentators watch the same debate? Or is this more of their inability to be objective news reporters?”
Did any of the commentators watch the same debate? I mean, really, McCain didn’t even deserve to be on stage with Obama. The simultaneously most wonderful and most abhorrent aspect of the American political system is that candidates like Obama and McCain end up at the same level even when they’re so most obviously not.
Also, it’s completely rad that the best political commentary I’ve seen is from a Canadian. Well done, MGK. “OBAMA HAS A BRACELET TOO! And his bracelet is all anti-war! BRACELET WARS!” ftw.
Oh, and concerning foreign policy, not only did Obama bust out the bomb-bomb-Iran reference ftw, but McCain couldn’t even pronounce the name of the president of Iran, to the point that Obama actually corrected him on it.
Audibly.
And even in spite of the three-foot-high lettered notes McCain had to sustain him through the debate.
Finally. Someone watched the same debate I did.
That was made of win, MGK. 😉
He should have followed through on Spain. When McCain was rambling about the Justice League of Democracies, Obama could have thrown in something like, “Don’t you need to be able to locate these countries on a map first, or at least know which side of the Atlantic to start looking for them?”.
Or he could have just pushed McCain that one last inch that was needed to make him lose it. That grin’s going to be stuck on his face for a week.
MGK: This is amazing. You are amazing. This is actually the first place I went to for the blow-by-blow review. I agree with most everything everyone has said, and have to add:
I watched this on Fox, because it was the channel I switched to first, and besides the rapid blinking = lying, my mother’s first response to McCain was noticing his tongue-mouth tics. In her words, “He looks like a Slytherin.” She also did a zombie imitation of him when I mentioned the rumors that he’d had a stroke, which was his real reason behind trying to postpone the debate.
My mom is amazing.
McCain was also spackled with makeup, his regular blotchiness was nowhere to be seen on my TV.
*this being his “real” reason to postpone, that is to say.
He’ll cut fixed-cost military contracts!
Correction: I believe McCain said he’d cut “cost-plus” contracts, in favor of “fixed-cost.”
For a quick explanation of the difference http://www.doityourself.com/stry/fixedcontracts
During the pre-condition bits, I kept hoping Lehrer would actually ask McCain to specify what exactly his pre-conditions would be for a sit down with those folk.
Was watching the debate with a bunch of people, thus when McCain started going off on how he’d met with such and such foreign leaders and Obama hadn’t, and Obama hadn’t been to Afghanistan, I let out a coughing noise that sounded suspiciously like “Palin”.
And I’m surprised that no one else seems to have picked up on this. At one point, McCain said something like “And Iran has a lousy government, and thus a lousy economy…”. Um, gee, right now the US has a lousy economy, so…
I do mean that people just didn’t seem to pick up on that. The bunch of people I was watching with were all extremely sharp and smart, and they didn’t realize what he’d said and its implications until I laughed at it and someone picked up on my laughter, realized why I was laughing, and said something about it.
But my own take was that Obama won slightly, but nothing near a knockout. I don’t think anything was said or done that will significantly sway undecideds either way.
I love your liveblogging! Pointed here by Cheetahmaster on Livejournal.
Thanks for the confirmation that they discussed North Korea and China. I’ll have to skip watching the post-commentary on PBS from now on, because they obviously weren’t paying attention: one of the analysts said he was disappointed that they didn’t talk about North Korea or China, and all the other analysts nodded. Just because Jim Lehrer didn’t ask a question about these countries didn’t mean the candidates didn’t talk about them!
There are many, many reasons to be pissed off at McCain. This morning I think I will go with….oh, let’s see…how about what he keeps saying about Iran?
McCain has repeated the following phrase or a variation of it a number of times: “This is a country that has said it wants to wipe Israel off the map.”
Okay, first of all I recently found out that the “wipe Israel off the map” thing is not an accurate translation of what Ahmadinejad said. Google it, learn for yourselves.
This is either something that McCain knows (meaning that him claiming that’s what Ahmadinejad said is just him perpetuating a myth or, to put it a more direct way, LYING), or something that he doesn’t know when he should know it. Guys in his position, aspiring to an even more powerful position, can’t afford to be misinformed.
Even if we assume that the translation was accurate, however, and we go by the exact wording as given to us by the media…even then, it’s “Israel must be wiped off the map.” Which is different, mind, than saying “WE must wipe Israel off the map.” That’s what John McCain keeps claiming it was: Iran saying that they would personally take care of the map-wiping.
It’s not the same thing. Any more saying “I wish John McCain would die” is the same as saying “I hereby declare my intent to purchase a firearm, travel to the States, and shoot John McCain.”
I’m not saying that I’m certain Ahmadinejad has no bad intentions, or violent intentions. I’m saying that it’s impossible for anybody to KNOW for sure given the evidence we’ve got now. And you know, after Iraq I am going to be pissed off if there’s a strike against Iran based on nothing more than that one mistranslated quote.
For all we know, they might be actually be telling the truth about pursuing nuclear power rather than nuclear weapons. Do we give them the benefit of the doubt? Yes, I say. We should give everybody the benefit of the doubt until we know for sure. Until there’s concrete evidence to back up the assertion that they want to nuke a country, either themselves or by proxy.
But hey, McCain doesn’t need evidence. It’s good enough for him to say “you know, those guys look suspicious. We should kill them just to be on the safe side.”
McCain has been to Georgia, you know!
Was he willing to make a deal?
No, but he did take a midnight train.
Rob,
It’s nice that you are willing to give Iran the benefit of the doubt w/r/t their nuclear program, but what is your test for determining whether it is for power generation or for weapons? Is it when they test a bomb? Is it when they use a bomb on another country? One way for a country to get their point across that they are indeed pursuing a peaceful nuclear program would be to cooperate with the IAEA. Here is some info straight off of their website, in regards to Iran’s program:
The Director General also updated Board members on the status of verification of Iran´s nuclear programme. “The Agency has been able to continue to verify the non-diversion of declared nuclear material in Iran. Regrettably, the Agency has not been able to make substantive progress on the alleged studies and associated questions relevant to possible military dimensions to Iran´s nuclear programme. These remain of serious concern,” he said. He then called on Iran to “show full transparency and to implement all measures required to build confidence in the exclusively peaceful nature of its nuclear programme at the earliest possible date.” (the link is: http://www.iaea.org/NewsCenter/News/2008/board220908.html)
Obviously, the US totally cocked up the works in Iraq, invading when all credible investigations claimed that Saddam did not have WMDs. That does not mean that the international community should just wait for Iran to prove that they have nuclear weapons. Once they have a bomb, that kind of ends the discussion on whether they should be stopped militarily (see, for example, North Korea).
Finally, while Ahmadinejad’s comments might have been mildly mistranslated, keep in mind that he has also claimed that the Holocaust was greatly exaggerated, he has claimed that Zionists are not Jews (using that as an explanation for how he doesn’t hate Jews), and his country is the major patron of two organizations (Hamas and Hezbollah) who have unequivocally stated that they wish to annihilate the state of Israel.
None of this means that the US and A has to bomb Iran to stop them, but it all means that something has to be done to prevent them from obtaining nuclear weapons. Personally, I favour the Obama approach of trying to solve this issue diplomatically, but advocating a ‘wait and see’ approach to the situation, in light of all of the statements and actions of the Iranian president, is extremely reckless considering the number of lives at stake.
WE ARE ALL GOING TO DIE
I watched this from “Miss congeniality” and then stopped at somewhere around Russia.
I was hanging out with my girlfriend, she was making me draw for her, and, while flipping the channel, she saw the presidential debate, and said “let’s watch it!”.
Me? I’m liberal/democrat/whatever, she’s conservative/republican/whatever. So of course we differ on the subject of who should be president.
She had to change the channel, because she saw how ANGRY I was getting with McCain. Mainly when he kept saying stuff about Obama that he DIDN’T say, like the Mahmoud Ahmadinejad thing. Even AFTER Obama pointed out that Ahmadinejad wasn’t the most powerful person in Iran, MCCAIN STILL FLAILED HIS ARMS AROUND saying “You want to meet with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad! You’ll legitimize him! He hates the Jews!” no matter how often Obama pointed out that he wasn’t even talking about meeting with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad!
Also, the new thing to do these days is to give presidential candidates bracelets that your dead soldier son used to wear.
And I think the reason McCain was so pissed was because he had to be up there with a black guy.
It’s nice that you are willing to give Iran the benefit of the doubt w/r/t their nuclear program, but what is your test for determining whether it is for power generation or for weapons? Is it when they test a bomb? Is it when they use a bomb on another country
If there is no way other of determining the truth (such as espionage) before they actually fire a missile, whether for testing purposes or attack purposes…then yes.
I have a question for you now. If you suspected somebody of plotting a murder, what would be your test for determining whether they were really preparing to kill somebody?
I will be interested in the answer you give. Whether you say that the right thing is to just keep an eye on them and wait until they do something wrong…or that the right thing is to go all “Minority Report” and lock them up just to be on the safe side. Or if you give some other answer.
Once they have a bomb, that kind of ends the discussion on whether they should be stopped militarily
Let’s say that they actually get a bomb, and everybody knows it. Is that in itself a reason to declare war on them?
If merely possessing nuclear weapons makes you a bad guy, then you’d have to attack a whole lot of other countries once you finished attacking Iran. You might even have to attack yourself.
I’ll compare this to a hypothetical situation involving individual people, again. Let’s say I see you buying a handgun. Shoud I immediately say to myself “ZOMG! 10FootBongz is going to commit murder!” Of course not.
Personally, I favour the Obama approach of trying to solve this issue diplomatically, but advocating a ‘wait and see’ approach to the situation, in light of all of the statements and actions of the Iranian president, is extremely reckless considering the number of lives at stake.
In other words, we can’t wait for a smoking gun because it might be a mushroom cloud, right? Are you aware of who else said that? Are you aware that he was dead wrong?
I would rather risk a mushroom cloud than see the United States (or any other nation for that matter) attack another country unprovoked, kill many civilians (as they inevitably would even if they weren’t trying), and later find out that the country they attacked had no murderous intentions.
[…] (This is a blog which rocks anyway, if you’re interested. But at least read the debate liveblogs. […]
I would love it if someone were to go out North Vietnam and try to find any of McCain’s old captors and see if they can shed some more light on the whole POW side of McCain’s story.
If nothing else we might at least hear a different version of it, at long last. Honestly, when people call McCain a hero it reminds me of what Homer said about Timmy O’Toole:
Homer: That Timmy is a real hero!
Lisa: How do you mean, Dad?
Homer: Well, he fell down a well, and… he can’t get out.
Lisa: How does that make him a hero?
Homer: Well, that’s more than you did!
🙂
In Russia, borscht eats you.
Without preconditions.
We have to watch out for Pottsylvania too. Otherwise was will happen to Moose and Squirrel?
Rob Brown, from what I remember Ahmadinejad said something much less alarming, as matter of fact. It was something akin to me saying “One day the republican party” (“the zionists”, Ahmadinejad said) “will be swept away from the pages of history like sand from the dunes of time” or something like that, in the sense of a gradual failure of their own hands and their own moral failures (in the same way I talk about Bush’s policies).
He really is an anti-semite fart, though. But that’s another story, and really irrelevant to what the rest of the facts are (specially considering the guy is just a puppet).
It’s really unbelievable the degree in which americans are made to clench their sphincters when it comes to Iran (remember the GOP convention 9-11 video this year that starts with “it started in Iran…”, and shows Lord Saviour Reagan or some other homoerotic macho-homophobe bullshit about warriors blahblah).
My first post, ever, and its something political. The closest I ever wanted to get to political would have been commenting on Doctor Doom. Rob, I think you’re vastly overslimplifying the issue with Iran, you seem to be arguing from a standpoint of it wouldn’t be so bad if they produced nuclear weapons, and that anyone that asks for any sort of action against them just wants to kill civilians (Even though bong expressly said he favored diplomacy).
It defies comparison to something as simple as one person thinking one other person might want to kill them, and the straw man of saying we’re going to bomb the civilians of a country simply because we have a mild inkling they might not like us is a bit insulting, as debait tactics go.
Fuck sake, people didn’t learn anything after killing more than 1 million people in Iraq (or “non-people”, since hajjis are just sand-niggers terrorists — or, as Secret Invasion puts it, “non human green alien monsters — Lizard Niggers”).
What are the laws in the U.S.? If you feel threatened by someone (even if you make shit up on your head about them), you get to kill them and their families, and do it all over again and again with others? ‘Cause otherwise would be too much of a risk?
Is “not being a sociopathic murderer scared shitless” just for “peace gaytards who live in Unicornland” now?
Gradeajay, I’m sorry but I don’t think I was making a straw man argument there. Bong said this:
“Once they have a bomb, that kind of ends the discussion on whether they should be stopped militarily…”
I interpreted that, perhaps mistakenly, as “if they get a bomb, then the time for diplomacy is done and military action should be taken.”
If military action is taken, I am very sure that civilians will die as a result. I really don’t want to see that happen.