Once again, Sarah Palin writes a column saying that the secret to American energy independence is drilling for oil.
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again: the fact that Palin claims energy issues as her particular sphere of expertise just amazes me, and similarly it amazes me that nobody important bothers to point out that, on her professed area of expertise, she is a goddamned idiot.
To be fair, for quite possibly the first time ever, Palin actually includes a few numbers in her screed: specifically, domestic American petroleum consumption. Unfortunately, this does not get her a cookie, because if you’re going to talk numbers about consumption and then say “well we gots to drill more of them wells you betcha,” you need to link it to that other number, which is production.
The United States has an estimated 21 billion barrels of remaining uncollected oil reserves.1 Were it all to become suddenly available tomorrow, the USA’s consumption rate of 19.5 million barrels per day wouldn’t allow it to last long. This is because a consumption rate of 19.5 million barrels per day is also a consumption rate of 7.1 billion barrels per year. So basically, the United States has nearly three years’ worth of oil reserves handy at its current consumption rate.
Of course, that figure isn’t really that meaningful either, because there is still no magic straw given to us by a friendly genie2 that gets all the oil out. Oil wells do not show up overnight. Even if the United States government expedited the leasing process, the oil companies still have to drill exploratory wells, develop a production plan from that exploration, and then install production wells. That’s a six-to-nine-year process to reach basic production.
And even when you reach basic production, you don’t reach peak production that quickly any more, because all the easily drilled oil deposits are now empty. Oil is sometimes in the ground in a big single pool; the Ghawar field in Saudi Arabia, for example, was mostly a big-ass single pool. But the big-pool deposits are mostly gone, so you can’t just stick a well into the ground and get all the oil from a single field. What’s left in the ground at this point is the harder-to-reach stuff: far-offshore fields (which take more than six to nine years to successfully explore and drill, one might add) and land-based fields which are kind of like Styrofoam except instead of air pockets there are oil pockets. These do not produce oil at “traditional” production rates. It will be in the neighborhood of fifteen years before anybody sees more than a relative dribble.
And finally, unless Sarah Palin plans to nationalize the oil industry like some sort of socialist or something, that oil is just going to go onto the free market anyway, where all the other countries in the world – like, say, India and China – will compete for its purchase. And frankly, at this point they can more easily afford it than the United States can.
So to sum up: Sarah Palin’s “drill” plan involves ignoring how much oil is actually in the ground, how quickly it can be drilled, how easily it can be accessed, and the basic reality of the global oil market. And this is where she thinks she is an expert.
Dear Rachel Maddow: please, just take all of this, put your Rachel Maddow style on it, and do a five-minute segment. You can’t tell me you don’t want to make fun of Sarah Palin again. You would be lying if you said that.
- CIA World Factbook, following from World Oil and Oil and Gas Journal. British Petroleum’s most recent publicly available statistical analysis – in 2007 – puts it at 30 billion, but most consider that an outlier. [↩]
- Genies hate the Middle East for bottling them, so clearly they would be on America’s side. Well, if they existed, anyway. [↩]
Related Articles
13 users responded in this post
Remember, she was governor of an oil producing state for almost three quarters of a term, so that makes her an expert.
You forgot the rate at which oil can be drilled safely and the quality of the oil drilled. Most of the oil we pump out of the ground here is a low quality stuff and barely suitable for refinement. This is why we import so damn much.
I once did the math when people were bitching about ANWR and at the time, gas was $3.50/gallon in the USA. I even rounded the total number of barrels in ANWR up to 5 billion instead of the projected 3.5 billion.
Long story short, we would only have saved 5¢ per gallon… and that’s only after making about 10 miraculous assumptions regarding quality and production.
Kenb3 is correct. Just like George W. Bush was the governor of a border state, so he was an expert of foreign policy. And Barack Obama was born in
KenyaHawaii and is an expert on native cultures and the oppressive hand of imperialists.Oh.. and assuming the rate of consumption would remain constant long enough for this oil to mean anything once it hits the market in 10 years (the projected time it would take for the oil to hit the market).
This somehow reminds me of George W. Bush’s oil policy. Specifically, his policy in the first year of his first term, where he kept trying to get favorable energy treaties with Mexico. One Mexican newspaper said, “Bush has a vision of cheap, limitless oil flowing from Mexico to the United States. Only three things stand in his way: The laws of physics, the laws of supply and demand, and the laws of Mexico.”
I live in an oil state, Oklahoma. There is still lots of known oil around, but most of the wells are idle these days– even last year when the price was soaring, they only started a few of them back up. Because it’s just not worth it. The amount of oil available from each well is pretty small, and since what remains is fairly thick, it’s hard to pump out. Most of the easy oil in the world is gone now, but so few people in Washington seem to understand that. But then, few people in Washington seem to understand much of anything besides how to wheel and deal for power.
I agree. Rachel Maddow covering this would be brilliant!
While it’s true her proposal wouldn’t do anything to solve the energy crisis, it certainly would bring industry, jobs and money to alaska. Is she an idiot, or just a politician trying for a pork barrel?
Midas: She’s an *ex*-politician trying to pork-barrel.
Seriously! She’s a one-time 3/4 term governor of a marginal state and a failed vice-presidential candidate. The next election is three years away, so it’s not even like she’s positioning herself for that. Why does she still get a national stage?
Is she an idiot, or just a politician trying for a pork barrel?
Yes.
Why does she still get a national stage?
Politically speaking she’s comparable to carrottop, but judged as a comedian she’s comparable to Bill Cosby.
And why did Cosby get booked to do stand up shows? Because he was really fucking funny.
Politically speaking she’s comparable to carrottop, but judged as a comedian she’s comparable to Bill Cosby.
And why did Cosby get booked to do stand up shows? Because he was really fucking funny.
Eh. I think you’re been too generous here. Politically speaking she’s comparable to that guy who’s friends always tell him he’s really funny so he gets up on stage drunk during open mike night and tries to do an entire act off the top of his head.
Judged as a comedian, she’s more comparable an Interstate traffic accident.
John Seavey: Mexicans aren’t *people*, you silly silly man! They’re just a bunch of siesta-taking taco eaters whose women start out really hot and then burn out before they’re forty, silly silly man. Besides, what would they even *do* with all of that oil, use it to power corn-grinding equipment and blenders for margaritas? Silly, silly silly man…
My supervisor says shit like this on a daily basis, and he honestly believes that Bush hung the moon in the sky. Pray for me.