Okay, so yesterday’s post on Bob Rae led me to thinking along the following lines.
1.) I have a predominantly American readership – even if this wasn’t obvious from all the “whozat” questions every time I delve into Canadian politics, Google Analytics confirms it pretty conclusively anyway.
2.) I like to post about Canuck politics every so often, because I like politics and I live here, and as I progress through law school I rather doubt this will change.
3.) Americans know practically jack shit about Canadian politics, regardless of whether or not we are your largest single trading partner (which we are). Most Americans know that Jim Carrey and Mike Myers are Canadians, and we appreciate that, but that is not quite the same thing.
So, in the interests of simple understandability, I am going to write a quick primer here for people who know shit-all about Canadian politics. This will not make you an expert by any means (well, except possibly in a relative sense). But it should provide the required basic glossary.
So:
Absolute idiot level beginning. (Advanced readers may wish to skip to the next paragraph.) Canada is a federal parliamentary system: we have ten provinces and three territories. Constitutionally, governmental powers are strictly divided between the federal government and the provinces. This aspect of our constitution leads to all sorts of interesting legal quandaries (like, for example, whether securities law should be federally regulated or not; on the one hand, property law belongs rightly to the provinces, but on the other hand the federal government can assert that securities law being uniform is necessary for the national public good).
Both the federal parliament and provincial legislatures elect Members of Parliament (MPs) / Members of Provincial Parliament (MPPs, although this designation technically varies from province to province, but MPP is a good catchall term). MPs and MPPs are elected on a riding basis: ridings are geographically divided segments of the country/province, much like American congressional districts. Our system is first-past-the-post, which often leads to disproportionately high majorities; attempts to switch to mixed-member representation (as used in Germany or New Zealand) usually fail, because the largest political parties shockingly do not want to give away their chances at majority governance and make sure nobody finds out about mixed-member representation.
(Canada also has a Senate, which is mostly superfluous and primarily exists for old-school political loyalists of note to occasionally say “wait, there’s a severe problem with this law here, try again” and then go back to having a nice nap. There remains fierce debate about how much everybody hates the Senate in this mold, but nobody can agree on what they want instead so it sticks around.)
Since Canada has a parliamentary system, that means our political system is – big shock – defined by political parties.
The Liberals. AKA “the Grits.” The Liberal Party is – despite its name – fairly centrist in political outlook, having drifted rightward somewhat over the past twenty years. (At most, it is at present very slightly centre-left.) It is also worth noting that the history of Canadian federal politics is, more or less, the history of the Liberal party, writ cyclically. For the past 120 years or so, the history of Canada can be written as follows:
Step 1.) Canadians put Liberals in power.
Step 2.) Liberals govern mostly competently for ten to fifteen years, and gradually grow corrupt with power.
Step 3.) Canadians get tired of blatant Liberal corruption, and elect a Tory government.
Step 4.) Tories stay in power for five to ten years, fuck up a lot, and remind everybody why they voted Liberal in the first place.
Step 5.) Repeat.
The Liberal party has historically been home to some very powerful and very notorious prime ministers: Pierre Trudeau is the most famous and probably most admired prime minister in Canada’s history, but Jean Chretien was a legendary backroom political streetfighter (complete with funny accent), Lester B. Pearson unified the armed forces, instituted national health care and helped give us our flag [1] and the extravagantly named William Lyon Mackenzie King led Canada through World War II, which started defining ourselves as a nation independent of Britain.
Then again, the Liberals also elected John Turner to office, and that didn’t really work out. The current leader of the Liberal Party is Stephane Dion, who is kind of like Harry Reid with better environmental bonafides and a funny accent, and is generally not expected to last much longer in the role.
The Conservatives. AKA “the Tories.” In comparison to the Liberals, the Conservatives live up to their name, by being the generally rightmost of Canada’s political parties. However, the question of “how right is rightmost” remains one of debate.
See, twenty years ago, the party was called the Progressive Conservatives – which, yes, is kind of like calling your party the “Liberal Republicans” or “Libertarian Socialists,” but that’s just how the Tories rolled at the time. However, the problem with conservatism as a philosophy in Canada is the same with conservatism in the United States – it’s a marriage of social conservatism and fiscal conservatism, and especially in Canada there are plenty of fiscal conservatives who are socially quite liberal – classically referred to as “Red Tories.” [2]
When Brian Mulroney led the PC party off the cliff at the federal level with his disastrous, contentious majority in the late 80s and early 90s, the party splintered into three factions: the “classic” Progressive Conservatives, the separatist-conservative Bloc Quebecois (more on them later) and the western-based wacko-conservative Reform party. The latter two parties picked up a bunch of seats in the 1993 federal election while the PCs were reduced to a mere two seats (out of more than 300, understand).
The Reform party, in a lame-ass attempt to rebrand so that it would become viable east of Manitoba, renamed itself the “Conservative Alliance.” This did not really work. A few years ago, the somewhat-rebuilt Progressive Conservative party and the Alliance merged to form the new Conservative Party.
The current party is a mishmash of remnant old-school Red Tories, Prairie-based social conservatives and religious rightists, and wannabe-Republicans desperate to enact every shitty idea the United States has already had, even if they failed the first time around. The current prime minister of Canada, Stephen Harper, falls from a mix of the latter two schools of Conservative thought, and his continued political strategy basically lies in convincing Canadians that he doesn’t mean all of it.
The New Democratic Party. AKA “the NDP” or “the Dippers.” A social-democrat party founded in 1961 when the CCF (farm-based socialists) and CLC (labour organizers) got together and decided to pool their political power. Their first leader, Tommy Douglas, the CCF premier of Saskatchewan and essentially the inventor of modern Canadian single-payer healthcare as we know it, is a beloved political figure in Canada on the level of secular sainthood. (He is also the grandfather of Keifer Sutherland. Isn’t that interesting?)
The NDP have never been in power at the federal level. They have been in power at the provincial level a fair number of times, sometimes successfully (multiple Saskatchewan governments, New Brunswick), and sometimes not (the Bob Rae government in Ontario). They are resolutely leftist, sometimes irritatingly so. Perhaps somewhat counterintuitively to the expected norm, although the NDP do well in big urban centres with leftist cores, they also have quite a few rural ridings – remember, this is a party that got started in Saskatchewan.
The current leader of the federal NDP is Jack Layton, a former Toronto municipal politician noteworthy both for his attack-dog politics and his Alex Trebek moustache. (His wife Olivia Chow, also an MP, is on record as absolutely hating her husband’s moustache. Layton periodically promises to shave it if the NDP win X percent of the vote then never does.)
The Bloc Quebecois. AKA “the Bloc.” The Quebec separatist party. The fact that Canada has a sizable political party dedicated, in essence, to ending the country as we know it has been remarked upon many times before, so do yourself a favour and don’t bother. Politically, the Bloc tends to be all over the map, as its only serious unifying political position is “Free Quebec – or, if not, then give Quebec stuff.” Rural Bloc MPs tend to be more socially conservative, but urban BQers are among the most socially liberal in Canada.
The current leader of the Bloc is Gilles Duceppe, generally agreed to be a well-liked, honest politician and isn’t it a shame he’s trying to tear the country apart.
The Green Party. AKA, like everywhere else, “the Greens.” For a long time the Green Party was the same assortment of boring old hippies driving soy-diesel VW vans and rambling on about the Man that you get everywhere else, but this changed about ten years ago when a collection of disaffected Red Tories joined the party and started gradually remaking it. Nowadays, the Green Party – while devoutly an environmentalist party in all respects – is more oriented towards an axis of fiscal conservatism and government investment/regulation in market-oriented solutions. (This should not be construed as the advancement of Republican-lite voluntary-targets type ideas. The Greens are serious.) The Green Party currently has zero MPs, but their share of the popular vote has, over the past decade, climbed from two percent to around twelve, so it’s generally considered to be only a matter of time.
Regionalism. Canadian politics, partly due to the federal system and partly due to the fact that we are geographically spread out all over the place (and mostly right next to the American border, where it is warmest and most convenient for trade), tends to have a very regional slant, with majority governments elected throughout the country happening with vanishing rarity. The makeup of Parliament varies from period to period as parties’ fortunes rise and fall, but right now the basic gist of things is as follows:
Ontario: The biggest province in Canada, obviously, so everybody else hates it with a passion for being big and rich and rich and big. Toronto (which everybody else in Canada hates, a fact which amuses Torontonians endlessly because it’s so cute when they act like their opinions matter) is a Liberal bastion with NDP pockets. Elsewhere, the most competition tends to be between Liberals and NDP for seats, although the Tories do have a good concentration in “the 905” (the ring of suburban ridings surrounding Toronto); however, Stephen Harper’s blatant willingness to interfere in Ontario politics from the federal level has helped steadily drive Tory fortunes downward in the province by dribs and drabs, and John Tory’s disastrous provincial leadership campaign didn’t help much either. (Yes, the Tories had a provincial leader named “Tory.” No, it wasn’t confusing, why do you ask?)
Quebec: Was for a very long time a contested region solely between the Bloc and the Liberals, depending on how sovereigntist or federalist Quebec generally felt at any point. However, the Tories and more recently the NDP have been making inroads here over the last few years, mostly because Quebecois have come to realize that voting for other non-Bloc parties can display a love of federalism just as easily as voting for the Liberals can. The Liberals, needless to say, are not happy about this, and less happy that other parties have figured out that Quebec will routinely vote for whichever national party offers them the most stuff simply for being Quebec.
The Maritimes: Mostly Liberal with Tory pockets, and the Tories here are largely Red Tories. The Maritimes are kind of like New England, except whiter. (Exception: Nova Scotia, which has a respectable black population descended from escaped slaves. I bet you didn’t know about that!)
Manitoba and Saskatchewan: Pretty much evenly divided between the Tories, NDP and Liberals, with one party generally slightly above the other two. Right now, the order of power here is probably Tories-NDP-Liberals. FUN FACT ABOUT MANITOBA AND SASKATCHEWAN: there are no fun facts about Manitoba and Saskatchewan.
Alberta: Wishes it were Texas, votes accordingly. Occasionally a Liberal will get elected in an urban riding in Calgary or Edmonton, but the key word is “occasionally.” At the provincial level, Alberta has had Tory governments for the past billion years or so and unsurprisingly has the lowest provincial taxes in Canada. Until about twenty years ago, was a receptor of transfer payments from the federal government, until all those tar sands suddenly became economically feasible for oil extraction and pretty much overnight it started funding poorer provinces instead of being a fundee. Albertans are tremendously bitter about this and often threaten to secede. This is because they are schmucks.
British Columbia: Canadian diversity in microcosm, contrasting the giant hippie commune that is Vancouver and Victoria with the BC inlands, where they look at you funny if you mention the wheel. The Green Party also has deeper roots here than elsewhere in Canada, so most likely when the first Green MP gets elected, it’s probably going to be in BC. Also, you put your weeeeeeeeeed in here, maaaaaan.
Health care. Yes, we have single-payer health care. It does not cover dental, optical, and most pharmaceutical costs (which are lower here than down south thanks to government barganining power), but pretty much everything else is covered. As political footballs go, this is one that right-wing parties have to juggle very carefully, because the gamut of Canadian opinion on government health care mostly ranges from “it is awesome” to “it is awesome, but it could be even more awesome by doing X.” (X is usually “hiring more staff” or “spending more money” or both.) The most notorious and radical advocates of free-market medicine mostly just suggest that we move to a private/public tier system like in France. Ninety-nine percent of the time, when someone posts on your favorite political blog claiming to be Canadian and how our health care system is a nightmare, understand that they are either lying about their nationality or a poster to FreeDominion, which is the Canadian equivalent of guess what website.
Small-l liberalism. Finally, it is important for American readers to remember that, for the most part, Canadian politics as a whole is significantly to the left of American politics. Those “centre-left” Liberals I mentioned would be liberal Democrats in America, and most New Democrats would be to the left of Bernie Sanders. Even the average Tory would be, at best, a fairly liberal Republican. (Of course, the rise of the Stephen Harper wing has created its very own group of dumb-assed neocon wannabes who would fit in just fine in the Republican caucus.)
Finally. Toronto is not pronounced “Toe-RAWN-toe.” It is pronounced “Toe-RAH-know” if you don’t live there, and “Trawnna” if you do. This has little to do with politics, but it’s valuable for you to know these things.
[1] Which, and this is true, was created by having a national contest where everybody could submit their designs and then having a parliamentary campaign pick the winner. Isn’t that great?
[2] Understand that in Canada we’ve had our political colours defined long before 2000 calcified the “red state blue state” thing down south. Tories are blue, Liberals are red, the NDP is orange, the Bloc is teal, and the Greens are, duh, green. Yes, this is the opposite of how the Americans do it. Tough. We came up with it first.
Related Articles
40 users responded in this post
I miss the Rhinoceros Party.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhinoceros_Party
What’s that pronunciation bit at the end all aboot?
BC also has fake liberals who are not liberal, at the moment headed up by Gordon “no, I don’t hate unions and the fact that I didn’t let local unions bid on building ferries and had Germans build them doesn’t mean anything, really” Campbell. Some people called him Slash Gordon for his stance on educational funding. But that was at a Canadian college, which are notorious hotbeds of leftism (seriously, the school newspaper had a tough time finding someone who was right-leaning for a series of articles, after having the one guy’d who’d written the right side for years finished and left college).
They got in through the long-standing Canadian tradition of “voting for the other guys after being fed up of the people who’ve been doing a darned good job, only to realize you massively fucked up later.”
This is great. I have often wondered how our neighbors to the south governed themselves.
I always wondered who the Dippers were. We used to have some (called the Democrats) but they imploded in a magnificent orgy of infighting. Canadian politics are dead easy to understand for an Australian – we even use the same colours for the slightly-left and getting-more-and-more-right major parties. We also did it before the US, and I always snicker when I see the Republican states listed as “Red”.
Why is “the 905” called “the 905”, some of you may be asking? That’s the area code.
One other thing is that even though I don’t live in Toronto but rather in that same 905 for 31 years, I’ve heard people talk about Toronto an awful lot, and in my experience they usually pronounce it “Tore-on-toe”. The one case of “Trawnna” I can think of off the top of my head is in this song..
Actually, now that I think about it some more, it’s also often pronounced “Ter-ronto” or “Ter-rondo.” In any case, if you’re an American and you’ve been saying “Toe-RAWN-toe,” don’t worry about it because there are Canadians and even Ontarians who say it that way.
Yay for phonetics.
Cool beans. Thanks for the primer.
Are TOO fun facts about Manitoba and Saskatchewan…
The term “from the wrong side of the tracks” comes from Winnipeg. FUN!
Everything I know about Canada, I learned from the Arrogant Worms.
Nice job. Slight correction:
Then again, the Liberals also elected John Turner to office
Turner wasn’t elected; he stepped into the job when Trudeau retired.
Canada’s list of prime ministers has a couple of things the U.S. doesn’t really have:
1. A lot of prime ministers who only served little bits of terms (Abbott, Thompson, Bowell, Tupper, Clark, Turner, Campbell, etc.)
2. A few prime ministers whose overall tenures as PM were noncontinuous (MacDonald, King, Trudeau… Meighen?)
There was a time when King was Prime Minister but didn’t hold a seat in Parliament, wasn’t there? So he had to watch the proceedings from the visitor’s box.
Further details about Jack Layton should probably be given for our American neighbors, after his recent appearance on Lou Dobbs as a Canadian expert on NAFTA.
…How can you be whiter than New England?? It doesn’t seem possible, and yet, it is.
So, Manitoba and Saskatchewan are like, the Canadian equivalent of Cleveland, or Detroit? I’m sorry. And, I’m also very, very sorry about Alberta wanting to be Texas.
One small correction/addition:
Quebec has been traditionally a Liberal stronghold, mainly because it was a Conservative Prime Ministers that draughted their young French men to fight the English war in 1917. However, in the 60’s, Diefenbaker (a conservative) and again in the 80’s, Mulroney, both won significant majorities in Quebec. The Quebec population tends to switch parties en masse, which means it’s a critical region to win in order to form a government. This means that all politicians pander to Quebec.
Just a little thing: “Libertarian Socialist” makes a lot more sense than “Progressive Conservative”, considering the people who coined the term ‘libertarian’ (in the French, ‘libertaire’) were anarchists, and anarchists have always been socialists. I would suggest the libertarian socialists have a lot more claim on the term ‘libertarian’ than the propertarians of the Right, who have no love for liberty and rights apart from property rights.
Manitoba and Saskatchewan are the Canadian equivalents of the US heartland — they are our Dakotas, our Kansas, our Minnesota and more. Also: Bleak.
Look. I don’t even know jack shit about American politics, and I live here. How about some more cute dogs?
Ah… the “Flyover states”, if you will. Thanks Mike!
Thanks for the primer.
Once again I am envious of countries with a parliamentary system. As an American, I have had plenty of opportunity to get frustrated by our imperial commander-in-chief, two-party system (or one corporate party with competing divisions), the electoral college, and our winner-take-all election scheme. Separation of powers is a great thing, and I like our independent judiciary (which, alas, has become ridiculously political); but really our President is weak on so many domestic issues, yet strong on military ones, leading us to the current health care crisis, destruction of social services, and the 5-year-old giant clusterfuck we are “celebrating” today.
And, yes, more puppies, please.
Oh, and: What BlackBloc sez. In the States, some anarchists prefer the term “Left Libertarian” but I think that just confuses people.
Kevin, I should probably point out that we – like most common-law countries – have an independent judiciary as well. Admittedly, we don’t have judicial elections at any level, but frankly I look at that as a plus rather than a minus.
Plus, our Supreme Court? Majority female right now. Wild, eh?
For “Maritimes” it should really read “Atlantic Canada” (unless you’re intentionally expressing a grudge against Newfoundland & Labrador? Damn them and their squid-jigging ways!) And though AC is pretty darn white, it has a relatively sizable Aboriginal population compared to New England (except for Newfoundland, but we don’t talk about that).
Saskatchewan is a strange province because most of the farmers are still Diefenbaker Conservatives. If your name isn’t Goodale, the people here vote Tory to stick it to Eastern Canada. It hasn’t worked yet, but they keep on trying.
Western Alienation is fun.
Fun Fact about Saskatchewan: We had the first socialist government in North America.
Awesome. Thank you.
Now I can go up to canada and only worry about driving on the proper side of the road and How much petrol costs per liter.
Nicely done
(Exception: Nova Scotia, which has a respectable black population descended from escaped slaves. I bet you didn’t know about that!)
I did not.
More important, however, I also do not know which Canadian politician gave the luncheon keynote at Take Back America on Monday. And apparently, neither does anyone else.
Well mr MGK, as a Canadian history/studies major, who has class literraly five minutes from Parliment Hill,* I would like to add to your section on the Conservative party. The two Canadian Prime ministers responsible for our independance, Sir John A Macdonald and Robert Borden**, were both conservative. What’s funnier is that both of them got in office due to anti-American rhetoric. Sir John A, who was goddamn awesome btw, basically united Canada by saying “The Americans are dicks, trying to cut off our trade, and invade us. Let’s get together, trade with each other, and they’ll back the fuck off.” and it work, and that’s confederation. Borden got elected by going “The liberals want free trade with the US. If we do that, they’ll annex us!” and he got elected! And what’s Harper doing now? Stating his love of the states….. how the conservatives have fallen ***
* WOO! Ottawa U!
** I know Borden was knighted, but he didn’t want it, nor did he want to be called sir, so I respectfully omit it.
*** I am not a conservative, and I have voted Liberal in the past, but I do feel that credit should go where credit is due.
Also, fun fact about Manitoba: It was founded by a rebellion by natives and Metis! A violent revolution! Bet you did know that, but didn;t mention it!
saskatchewan: It’s flat and boring!
saskatchewan: It’s flat and boring!
Oh, come on, not only is its name fun to say, but it contains cities named Moose Jaw, Saskatoon, and Regina. And remember how much fun it was to call up establishments with public lavatories in Prince Albert and ask if they had anyone in their can?
Oh, hey. Isn’t Dog River in Saskatchewan? That’s got to be something fun about it!
Saskatchewan also has the honour of housing both of Canada’s “most crime” cities – Regina and Saskatoon!
http://www.macleans.ca/article.jsp?content=20080312_162114_5536
I would give Laurier and King as much credit for Canadian independence as MacDonald and Borden; King, in particular, was in the 1920s the principle opponent within the Commonwealth to increased ties with Britain, leading to the Statute of Westminster in 1931 (by then the PM was Tory R. B. Bennett, who, ironically, was the only PM to become a British lord, moved to Britain in a sulk after losing office, died and is buried there), and through the conduct of World War II and its aftermath forged a firmly independent path, including the first independent Canadian citizenship.
“Maritimes” should be “Atlantic Canada”, though that’s common mistake made by people who aren’t from this area; Maritimes refers to Prince Edward Island, Nova Scotia, and New Brunswick; Newfoundland and Labrador is part of Atlantic Canada, but not the Maritimes.
One of the major differences between Canadian and American systems is that the Canadian system is largely uncodified practice, rather than the super-codified US government style. As well, the electoral system is frankly a lot fairer and more organized in operation; the blatant, acceptable gerrymandering of electoral boundaries is basically unheard of here, and elections are administered centrally by non-partisan agencies with the same rules and voting systems for everyone (we also don’t use voting machines, just strict “mark an x” ballots).
Andrew Says:
March 19th, 2008 la 4:46 pm
Oh, hey. Isn’t Dog River in Saskatchewan? That’s got to be something fun about it!
But Stephen Harper’s been there, so I’m staying as far away as I can. Blecch.
Very interesting! Prior to this, all I knew about Canadian politics was that Stephen Harper is a giant potato who feasts on the hate of the maritime provinces. And that despite what George W. Bush thought back in 2000, you have never had a Prime Minister Poutine.
Oh, one picky little point regarding your Point 3, above.
After 30 or 40 years as America’s largest trading partner, Canada has just been eclipsed by China.
We are unlikely ever to get the title back.
Maybe Americans should know more about us simply because we are their closest friend and ally. And we need the hugs.
No, Stephen Harper was only there in a daydream about the cost/benefit analysis of putting normal-sized Prairie Dog statues around town. It didn’t technically happen.
Now if you’ll excuse me, I’m off to wreck a barn!
But maybe being there would make me have dreams with Stephen Harper in them, like Hank. I don’t want to risk it…
Great primer, but you missed one small detail. Like our U.S. cousins nearly all of our candidates for office are primarily people who lie through their teeth.
[…] post by MGK Filed under Political Strategy […]
[…] truth, I don’t know enough about Canadian politics to be passionate one way or another. This site has an interesting (although difficult to read, because of the awful color scheme) primer on […]