10 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif

I know what you mean. In my short blog review after seeing the movie I wrote:
“Mila Kunis. When the hell did she become gorgeous and sweet instead of vapid and annoying? Crap. I want to date Meg Griffin now.”

ReplyReply
mygif

See I think the inherent flaw in the movie is that I personally could not accept Kristin Bell dumping me. I would let her fuck that rocker guy, as long as I got mine. Hell, a woman that good looking should be shared anyway.

ReplyReply
mygif

Shared with me, i mean. Just me.

ReplyReply
mygif

Maybe lack of constant exposure to Scientologists makes her a better actor. Or, like Kutchner and “Butterfly Effect”, they each have a couple decent movies in them…

ReplyReply
mygif

You are mistaken, sir. Russell Brand is the best thing about that movie.

ReplyReply
mygif
Andrew W. said on May 14th, 2008 at 5:02 am

MGK’s a Skrull! Get ‘im!

ReplyReply
mygif
bunnyofdoom said on May 14th, 2008 at 3:54 pm

Well, we did see her boobs. Well, not her real boobs, but her face next to boobs, and that works for me.

ReplyReply
mygif

Part of me died when I figured out those weren’t actually Mila’s knockers.

ReplyReply
mygif

Well, you guys (and lady-loving ladies) can rest easy, for those were actually Mila’s knockers.

I’m pretty sure that was a picture of her that wound up on the internet shortly after she got famous. putting it in one of her movies a bunch of years later is what I’d call taking it like a champ.

But truly that movie belongs to Russell Brand, man.

ReplyReply
mygif
motteditor said on May 15th, 2008 at 7:15 pm

Just saw it today and thoroughly enjoyed it. Good stuff all around, on everyone’s parts.

ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please Note: Comment moderation may be active so there is no need to resubmit your comments