Norm Wilner, who I like and respect greatly, recently wrote a screed regarding Rob Ford and why he needs to be saved. It’s not an uncommon sentiment among those who do not like Rob Ford. If he’d only get some help is said so often with respect to Rob Ford that it deserves to be acronymized, frankly, and it’s not surprising that this is the case: after all, if you consider addiction to be a disease (which it is), then it becomes harder to assign Ford moral fault for suffering from that disease. Diseases need treatment, not condemnation, and this is why so many political enemies of Rob Ford have been urging him to go seek treatment, even if it only means a temporary leave from office rather than the permanent exile from politics Rob Ford deserves.
1/2 i was told three years ago by a t.o. city councillor that they all knew ford was drunk at work every day, and that he bought a mickey…
— torquilcampbell (@torquilcampbell) November 4, 2013
The problem is this: addiction is morally neutral, but how a person chooses to deal with that addiction is not. There is a way to live with addiction responsibly and soberly (or at least as soberly as possible – part of addiction is the constant threat of relapse). Rob Ford, as Norm rightly notes, has never dealt with his obvious problems in a responsible manner. Even now, when he publicly admits to having been flagrantly smashed in public, he’s not admitting to any real problem. “I’m just going to stop” is not the answer of someone who admits to addiction. It’s the answer of someone pretending he’s not. This is vintage spoiled-child Rob Ford, and it was what most of us expected him to do.
2/2 at the dundas lcbo on his drive home each day and poured it into a slurpee cup and drank it as he drove home.
— torquilcampbell (@torquilcampbell) November 4, 2013
Here’s the thing: we expected him to do it because Rob Ford is not a good person. I don’t just mean he’s weak – although he is weak, that much is certain – because weakness, in and of itself, could be forgiven. But in addition to being weak, Rob Ford is a bully. He’s mean. He’s not just stupid; he’s proudly ignorant. He’s arrogant. He’s rude. He’s a hypocrite. He’s a liar. He has a pronounced violent streak that he barely controls in public; Norm says Rob Ford is an “accident waiting to happen” but the police have responded to multiple domestic disturbances at Ford’s home over the years and there is a fair case to be made that the “accidents” are potentially not theoretical at this point.
And if you think that last sentence is speculative, you have to understand this: Norm works in journalism, as do I (well, as a sideline), and we talk with our fellow journalists all the time, and here is the thing: what is being said, publicly, about Rob Ford is quite literally only the tip of the iceberg. Rob Ford’s public alcoholism has been an open secret for literally years; drug use falls into the same area, where everybody knows it happens but nobody can report on it because, after all, if the mayor purely hypothetically speaking stumbles out of a bathroom with white powder on his face, you can’t prove it’s cocaine, and if you don’t have a picture then you can’t even prove it happens. If it had happened, of course. Similarly, if one of the videos the police recovered off those hard drives was the newest candidate for “worst four-word sentence in the English language,” by which we mean “Rob Ford sex tape,” then that’s strictly hypothetical too. Completely hypothetical. And we certainly can’t say if Rob Ford hypothetically uses the services of prostitutes.
And that’s just the light hypothetical stuff. I’m not going to go into the heavier stuff. That way lies madness and accusations of open, active criminality.
this cnclr. also said ford slept in his office all day, usually taking one meeting. he said they all thought he would be dead within a year.
— torquilcampbell (@torquilcampbell) November 4, 2013
I understand compassion and most of the time I preach it. But compassion, when applied to the cold hard necessities of politics, cannot and should not be an endless well. (Hell, even outside of politics someone who actively commits harm – and Rob Ford does commit harm, on many levels – cannot be given compassionate treatment when you need them to stop.) Rob Ford does “not need to be saved.” He needs to be put out of his political misery and exiled from public life. Permanently. I have no sympathy for him, no pity; so many people have done so much more with so much less than Rob Ford it is just sort of laughable. He has been given every chance and he has squandered all of them. He deserves only scorn.
Related Articles
20 users responded in this post
Although I’m not currently living there, as a native Vancouverite I feel obligated to point out that our Mayor is pretty great. He might be a robot, but that’s the worst of it. And if he is, he’s one of the friendly ones.
Having also sidelined in journalism, with friends that are political beat reporters, I can confirm the frustrating amount of stuff you end up KNOWING is true but can’t — either legally or ethically — report.
I’m still trying to puzzle out how a GTA character became mayor of a city…
“Compassion” doesn’t necessarily equal “acquiescence”.
The most compassionate thing anyone could do for Rob Ford would be to make him resign as Mayor and check into rehab, and stay out of public life until such time as he is clean, sober, and law-abiding.
If you really want to try and save Rob Ford the person, it means not putting up with his bullshit, forcing him to address his numerous problems, and teaching him to understand accountability and responsibility.
Simply standing back and/or enabling his horrific behaviour is not compassion, it’s cowardice.
You mean how a GTA character became Mayor of the GTA? š
I’m sorry, but “tip of the iceberg” is going to be non-literal in most cases. Unless you’re on the Titanic or something.
Well, it’s the literal tip of the metaphorical iceberg, see. š
“Tip of the iceberg” might be literal if he’s secretly hoarding icebergs and then I guess melting them as part of a misguided evil plot? I got nothing.
I like this bit from the BBC’s account of his confession (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-24824651):
‘But Mr Ford maintained to reporters that when he previously denied using the drug: “I wasn’t lying. You didn’t ask the correct questions.”‘
As if he’s some sort of djinn, and the reporters just botched an attempt to cast Wish.
@Mitchell Hundred: Maybe we should just turn Rob Ford into a robot. He won’t have any more problems with crack and alcohol, or any other failings of the fleshy ones.
@Cookie McCool: Now I’m going to spend all day thinking up evil plots involving hoarded icebergs. Thanks.
“That’s right, Mister Bond… the polar icecaps haven’t been melting at all, I’ve been STEALING them! Piece by piece! For you see, the world’s developed countries are using up their supplies of fresh water. And once it’s gone, why then, who shall come to their rescue? Yours truly, of course! I shall be the saviour of the civilized world, asking only my modest fee in return.”
@Gravy Express – I LOL’ed, but then I placed a small bet with myself as to whether Alex Jones will start accusing the federal government of stockpiling icecaps just as you describe…
BTW, can I steal for an attributed quote?
Since the first time I saw a picture of Rob Ford, I have maintained that he is, in fact, Auric Goldfinger.
Well, he might look the part, but Goldfinger’s smarter!
The man is a bully, coward, and an incompetent jackass. You summed it up nicely, MGK.
His fans are demented. Beyond demented. There’s no reasoning with them. It’s like a cult.
Always put me in mind of Flounder from Animal House more than anyone else.
Meanwhile, how about them allegations that Ford tried to hire a hacker to destroy the video in a desperate gambit right out of a Shadowrun game?
http://www.blogto.com/city/2013/11/vice_alleges_ford_hired_hacker_to_destroy_crack_video/
I say Ford should have his own words applied to him, as he said lock the crack smokers up in jail and let them tough it out that way. If he wants to preach “tough love” he should suffer the consequences of equal treatment under the eyes of the law.
Mr. Ford’s lawyer, one Dennis Morris, has just been interviewed on BBC radio.
He’s not even on nodding terms with reality, is he ? That is some weapons grade denial going on there.
[…] A few passages from this piece originally appeared on mightgodking.com. […]
@PanthyrLee — why of course! š
When you mentioned hypothetical worst-case other videos that might hypothetically have been retrieved by the police from that hard drive, I couldn’t help but remember a story called “Chicken George” (published on kuro5hin in 2005).
Just saying that even worst-case scenarios can get worse.
This. Even in twelve-step meetings, where you’re urged to concentrate on your own program and keep from taking someone else’s moral inventory, there’s a recognition that you don’t need to tolerate behavior that potentially harms others. Or, ah, so I’ve heard.