66 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif

The closest I’ve been to seeing any of those is the Yu-Gi-Oh movie. I remember thinking about seeing it, because I liked the anime – still a bit nostalgic about it, really – and deciding not to.

I have seen the abridged version, which is seven kinds of awesome.

ReplyReply
mygif

Apparently I’m a glutton for punishment because I’ve subjected myself to 15 of those.

ReplyReply
mygif

Happily N’Ever After wasn’t bad. It wasn’t great, but by no means a stinker, either. It had some good moments in it.

Then again, a Top # of Anything List is designed solely to generate traffic, comments, and arguments, these days. Plus they’re easy to churn out on a deadline, which is I’m sure why so many websites do Top # of Anything Lists.

ReplyReply
mygif

I haven’t seen any of these!! Yay!!!!

ReplyReply
mygif

@ highlyverbal and Kid Kyoto

The year zero was spent in 2000 years worth of leap years. Get over yourselves.

ReplyReply
mygif
ps238principal said on September 30th, 2009 at 12:54 am

I would love to know the circumstances under which you saw the Uwe Boll films listed (Dungeon Siege and Bloodrayne). Did you lose a bet? Have a desire to test your mental mettle? Experience a momentary lapse in judgment?

I mean, it’s not like anyone decided to experience these movies with any illusion that they’d be enjoyable, unless you were marooned on a satellite with a few wisecracking robots.

ReplyReply
mygif

You know, actually, Boll’s Postal was really funny. On purpose. Witness the fact it didn’t make the list, unlike his other works and most other video-game conversions. Speaking of those, how did DOA: Dead or Alive not make it on the list?

ReplyReply
mygif

Never seen any of these films and most of them I’ve never even heard of to begin with.

ReplyReply
mygif

I feel heaps better about myself after reading this list, since I haven’t seen any of them it means I haven’t wasted the last decade as much as I could have.

highlyverbal, RE:

“These would all deserve italics in my book, because I can’t consider 2000 as part of this decade.”

1st, a decade doesn’t have to mean `the 90s’ or `the 80s’ or whatever as, while that’s it’s common usage, the word can be used to mean merely `10 consecutive years’ (i.e 06/14/1876 to 05/14/1886 is a decade) and the list clearly just says `the decade’.

But even if we’re applying the common usage the convention has been to bound a decade by name i.e. 1990-1991 so I can onyl assume your objection is based around the old `there was no year zero’ misconception. Since our whole calenda was made up years after `the fact’ anyway, speaking in a strick mathmatical sense any given two number lines can overlap so there is no porblem in considering 1 BC to ALSO be 0 AD and 1 AD to also be BC. This effectively removes the issue and is more inline with the general idea of what a whole number is (the end of a transition from the previous whole number, not the begining) so rather than thinking of the year 2000 being the 2000th year one can consider the year 2000 to being the incomplete 2001st year in the AD sequence.

Hey, man they’ve sure made some bad movies this decade haven’t they?

ReplyReply
mygif

Hey MGK, can you edit my above post so my spelling doesn’t suck so much? Thanks.

ReplyReply
mygif

I’ve seen 12 of these, and I would only but 4 of them on a bottom 100 list. Or at the very least, lower on the list. Because, how does kickin it old skool make the list and malibu’s most wanted doesn’t. and again, WHITEOUT?

ReplyReply
mygif

I find it strange to note I’ve only seen one on this roll of shame : and it’s Ecks vs Sever. What was it with that film?

ReplyReply
mygif

I think that the scariest thing here is that someone presumably watched all these movies, and a lot of others that didn’t suck quite so much.

I’m not sure I’d trust the judgement of anyone that masochistic.

ReplyReply
mygif
Thomas Wilde said on September 30th, 2009 at 1:45 pm

Candlejack: DOA features some genuinely funny moments, typically involving Jaime Pressly interacting with Kevin Nash, and is otherwise an utterly harmless T&A martial-arts movie. It’s not bad by the standard this list adheres to.

As for the list itself, I only have two real issues with it. One is that Ultraviolet isn’t on there; the other is that, as usual, it’s the hundred worst mainstream American films of the decade. If you’re going to shamelessly generalize, hit the video store first.

ReplyReply
mygif

Huh. I’ve not even heard of most of those movies. I suppose that’s the upside of hardly watching television anymore.

ReplyReply
mygif

I read through the list, counted 0 I’d seen, and felt like high-fiving myself.

ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please Note: Comment moderation may be active so there is no need to resubmit your comments