23 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif

I think it’s funny that the UK version gives Richard Curtis’ name, while the American one just lists his credits.

ReplyReply
mygif

@rwe1138 : Well, lets be honest..most Americans aren’t going to know his name…wheras those of us who do think he’s a household name in England.

What I want to know is why did they change the boat they were walking off.

ReplyReply
mygif

Target audience of first poster: people who appreciate aesthetics, Brits who know who these actors and the director are, people who remember when music came on records with album covers. Target audience of second poster: Americans.

ReplyReply
mygif

What I want to know is why did they change the boat they were walking off.

To be fair, the second boat is more evocative of a boat (in terms of shape and location of the plank relative to the boat.) The second plank also looks a bit better, since it has actual 3-D perspective.

(Although probably the reason the Hollywood people changed the boat was to provide more room on the plank, so they could fit in the unnecessary extra 2 people.)

(Since I’m discussing minor changes, the second ocean+clouds is clearly worse, since the clouds+ocean should be drab to help elicit the mood of the ending.)

ReplyReply
mygif

Need I remind you that nearly 49% of this country saw absolutely no problem with voting Sarah Palin into the second highest office in the land.

The USA is a culture that not only lacks refinement, but prefers it that way. Its almost as if we go out of our way to avoid the refinement.

“We’re not Spartans. We’re Americans, with a capital ‘A’, huh? You know what that means? Do ya? That means that our forefathers were kicked out of every decent country in the world. We are the wretched refuse. We’re the underdog. We’re mutts!” — Stripes

So when an intelligent, yet dry comedy/history piece comes out, the only way Hollywood can think to promote it is to sell it as a zany, screwball comedy.

“And, finally, here are some completely gratuitous pictures of penises to annoy the censors and to hopefully spark some sort of controversy, which, it seems, is the only way, these days, to get the jaded, video-sated public off their fucking arses and back in the sodding cinema. Family entertainment? Bollocks. What they want is filth.” — The Meaning of Life

And naturally since they want to squeeze every last dollar out of the American audience, they had to include the female actress for both sex appeal and to appease the misandric feminists and the young male character because they want young people to relate to his youth.. instead of, you know, actual character development.

It sucks, but there it is.

ReplyReply
mygif

So when an intelligent, yet dry comedy/history piece comes out, the only way Hollywood can think to promote it is to sell it as a zany, screwball comedy.

Yes, but The Boat That Rocked is in fact a pretty zany comedy; it’s a smart one, sure, but this is pretty firmly in the Carry On tradition in a lot of ways. Any movie where Nick Frost is a successful pussy hound, etc.

ReplyReply
mygif

The title of the movie when it was released in France 6 months ago was “Good Morning England”.

So I think actually prefer the american one.

ReplyReply
mygif

Yes, but The Boat That Rocked is in fact a pretty zany comedy; it’s a smart one, sure, but this is pretty firmly in the Carry On tradition in a lot of ways. Any movie where Nick Frost is a successful pussy hound, etc.

I don’t think Carry On was ever released in the states. Would you like to hazard a guess on the posters Hollywood would make for them?

How’s that for a test of ye photoshoppe skills?

I’m not saying that it wont be a good comedy for people who tend to have higher sensibilities, but the majority of stateheads just don’t have that refinement and many would reject it outright if given the chance to choose.

Even if the majority of the stateheads do enjoy the comedy as a zany comedy, they still need the premise to be sold to them on their level so they can understand it. A poster using an intelligent musical metaphor is just too risky.

So the other crap was added as a pure, juvenile marketing ploy and the intelligence of the original poster was sacrificed for more conventional advertisement strategies.
Repackaged for the willfully unrefined.

Think of it this way: How would McDonald’s advertise a new value meal of escargot and dom perignon?

Still sucks, but there it is.

ReplyReply
mygif

So the movie IS good, then?

ReplyReply
mygif

I was mad enough by the retitling. Like … you don’t trust me to get “The Boat That Rocked,” you had to tell me it’s about a pirate radio station in the most on-the-nose way possible?

“Silence of the Lambs”? That’s a stupid title, how about “Charismatic Serial Killer Lends A Hand”? What’s with this “Pride and Prejudice” garbage? I suggest we retitle all future American releases “Girl Falls In Love With Kind Of A Jerk, But He Turns Out To Be A Decent Guy In The End.”

ReplyReply
mygif

UK Poster: Homage to Abbey Road.

US Poster: Looks like one of those “___ Movie” movies, title and all.

ReplyReply
mygif

Sadly, the art of movie posters has been dead for a while now in America. That’s because it falls under the marketing umbrella, and marketing for most movies has become an utterly soulless, frighteningly calculated, almost Orwellian affair. They have some fucking formula for what percentage of a star’s face should be featured on the poster, leading to some hilariously hamfisted results like L.A. Confidential (GIGANTIC KIM BASINGER with tiny, then-unknown Russell Crowe and Guy Pierce and semi-obscure Kevin Spacey in the background) and Being John Malkovich (GIANT CAMERON DIAZ, smaller John Cusack, even smaller Catherine Keener, and John Malkovich–WHOSE HEAD THEY ARE EMERGING OUT OF AND WHOSE NAME IS IN THE TITLE–nowhere to be seen). This was once a vibrant subgenre of art, but as with much about Hollywood these days, creativity takes a back seat to the comforting, supposed assurance of marketing formulae. Even though creativity is often what gets people into the theater in the first place.

The only way you get good posters is when a director has clout and cares about the marketing of their movie. And even then, sometimes you just get a cool alternate poster that’s merely sold to collectors rather than used to market the movie (There’s a terrific Big Lebowski poster showing a kaleidoscope of bowling pins reflected in The Dude’s shades, but I only ever saw it in World of Posters).

I also thought it was ironic that The Phantom Menace was so well marketed, complete with Drew Struzan posters–why did Lucas apparently care enough to market the film well, but not to, y’know, make it not suck?

ReplyReply
mygif

complaining about movie posters is pretty curmudgeony

ReplyReply
mygif

Or, alternately, nerdy. Y’know. This being the internet and all.

ReplyReply
mygif

Actually, there’s plenty of good movie posters being designed today- they’re just not the ones being USED.(Seriously, have you seen the Frazetta poster for FROM DUSK TIL DAWN? The CASINO ROYALE “playing card” poster? Or Drew Struzan’s ORIGINAL poster for THE MIST?) Foriegn posters are still interesting, though- I just saw a German poster for the new A CHRISTMAS CAROL that made it look like it might actually be a GOOD MOVIE…which is actually kind of a nasty trick to play on the audience…)

ReplyReply
mygif

I was mad enough by the retitling. Like … you don’t trust me to get “The Boat That Rocked,” you had to tell me it’s about a pirate radio station in the most on-the-nose way possible?

With music piracy being a big deal in the states and with Talk Like a Pirate Day and Pirates of the Carribean and various other pirate-themed popular successes, the name change actually doesn’t bother me in the least.

Drawing a segway between modern pirated music and 70s pirate music makes a lot of marketing since.

But the poster itself got completely trashed up.

ReplyReply
mygif

Name me one great Hollywood poster in the last 5 years. They’re all shit, from what I can see.

ReplyReply
mygif
Marionette said on November 3rd, 2009 at 4:42 am

And naturally since they want to squeeze every last dollar out of the American audience, they had to include the female actress for both sex appeal and to appease the misandric feminists

I think you need to add more than one token girl to a lineup of male characters before you’d appease even quite moderate feminists.

I’d also just like to say that while the American poster is just sad, I did see a number of posters for The Ship that Rocked (not the one above) when it was on here, and I had no idea it was about pirate radio until now.

ReplyReply
mygif
scarecrowprophet said on November 3rd, 2009 at 5:23 am

being fair (and this is from someone who saw the film in the UK about six months ago, with all the UK advertising beforehand) the screaming boat is a plot element in the film; you kind of make it sound like a photoshops stunt with no relevance.

and i don’t think this reveals any fundamental truths about america. plus, for those waiting on it, its a TERRIBLE film.

ReplyReply
mygif

Thing you have to remember is….the film flopped.

Desperation is not surprising.

ReplyReply
mygif

I also can’t help but notice that the trailers and promos emphasize “The British Government banned rock and roll… but an American DJ and a band of renegades…”

Bet they’d love that back home.

ReplyReply
mygif
Generic Lad said on November 4th, 2009 at 4:19 am

It was a fun film, not brilliant, but not terrible, and creating a mix where Frost, Nighy, Ifans, and Hoffman can just goof around is no bad thing. Plus, Branagh and Jack Davenport make fun bad guys.

I’d be more concerned about the edits Hollywood will make to the film than the film poster.

ReplyReply
mygif

Really great!.Because the title of the movie when it’s released in France 6 month ago was
Good Morning England.

ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please Note: Comment moderation may be active so there is no need to resubmit your comments