I don’t know if you’ve heard or not lately, but dad-made billionaire Donald Trump has been capturing the attention of the nation by suggesting he might possibly run for President of the United States. This is actually one of those things that happens every decade or so; some massively rich person like Trump (or Perot or Forbes) announces that they’re going to run for President because they’re successful businessmen, and “they can run this country like a business.” For some reason, this quote is never greeted with the guffaws of hilarity that it deserves; somehow, we never hear about famous directors announcing that they’re going to run America like a production of “Guys and Dolls”, or successful ranchers announcing that they’re going to run America like a cattle farm. When businessmen announce that they’re going to run America like they ran IBM, though, we can’t get enough.
Probably it’s just that we’re easily impressed by businessmen in America. We might not know much about governing, but pretty much everyone has tried to make money, and we all know how hard it is. So when someone who makes a lot of money talks, we tend to say, “Wow. He must be smart, if he can make that much money.” (We tend to forget options like, “He must be incredibly unethical,” or “He must have a rich daddy whose money he squandered to the point where he had to declare bankruptcy multiple times.”) But maybe, just maybe, these businessmen have a point. Let’s look at some of the ways Obama could run America like a business.
1) Cut out the middleman. Right now, the United States has a military budget that dwarfs its discretionary spending. A large part of that comes from the research, development and purchase of military equipment. Back in the days when peacetime meant considerably less spending on weapons technology, it made sense to contract this work out, but this is the 21st century. We’re a military superpower now, and it’s time to accept that we’re constantly equipping our troops. So Obama should use eminent domain to confiscate the assets of companies like Honeywell, General Dynamics and Pratt & Whitney and nationalize them, passing the savings along to the American taxpayer.
2) Cut our losses on unprofitable projects. At this point, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan have cost us trillions of dollars without achieving any of the goals we set or generating any kind of return on our investment. Any good businessman would take the hit, write off the losses, and proceed to something that makes a profit.
3) Explore alternative revenue streams. The federal government makes money by taxation. (It spends money by providing services to its customers, a vital difference that makes it impossible to apply traditional business models to government, but we’re pretending that’s not true right now.) So if you want to make extra money without tax hikes, you need to find something else to tax. The currently-illegal drug trade is a multi-billion dollar industry that currently goes completely untaxed, due to our insistence on throwing both producer and consumer in jail. Legalizing drugs would not only save us billions of dollars a year in enforcement costs, it would generate billions more in tax revenue. Sure, some might complain about the morality, but we’re running America like a business now, and it’s the bottom line that counts!
4) Expand your revenue base through mergers and acquisitions. Right now, one of the most contentious issues in American politics is immigration. People want to defend the borders, people want to make sure that Mexicans have a path to citizenship, people want to make sure that Mexicans can continue to provide a labor base to the agricultural industry. In addition, people want to make sure that the Mexican drug trade doesn’t cause problems for America. The obvious solution? Annex Mexico. You have a much smaller southern border to defend, the Mexicans become citizens and don’t have to worry about hostile borders, and the drug trade becomes legal (see point number 3.)
5) Ensure a consistent long-term vision from the top. Elections every four years? A new CEO every eight years, one that could wind up with a diametrically-opposed viewpoint to the current head of the company? No sane business would even dream of operating this way. No, it’s time for Obama to abolish the electoral process and declare himself CEO For Life. It’s the only way to make sure that the long-term goals of America get recognized.
6) Get rid of unnecessary middle management. What does Congress even do, other than get in the President’s way and neuter his bold plans for America’s future? Fire ’em all, and deal directly with the governors. (Who are, of course, free to fire their state legislatures as well, so long as they understand that they can be replaced if they don’t do what the boss says.) The savings in Congressional salaries alone would be worth millions.
7) Outsource unprofitable divisions. Look, there’s really no nice way to say this, but…there are some states that just aren’t pulling their weight. They’re always near the bottom in education, employment, and a host of other standard-of-living categories, and they constantly demand federal money while decrying federal interference. It’s time to just go ahead and “downsize” the populations of these states (humanely, of course) and replace them with cheaper citizens from China or India. Just bring them over here, put them to work, and let them help make America great again!
These are just a few of the great strategies I have, and I’m not even smart enough to have a rich dad like Trump! I’m sure that a CEO as President would usher in a new Gilded Golden Age for this country, and I don’t see why we should wait for 2012 to start implementing it.
Related Articles
23 users responded in this post
Frankly, I think that’s better than the GOP’s plan.
They do run America like a business: low wages for the workers, and fat dividends for the share owners.
You know, the thought of seeing some of these implemented actually appeals to me on some level, just to see what might happen.
When I started reading the last point, I thought you were going to suggest selling some states to foreign countries.
The sad fact is the states that we would most like to downsize would be the ones that nobody else wants.
I can’t see the chinese beign willing to purchase Mississippi.
And if we are annexing Mexico, we might as well take Canada too- all those mineral resources and open lands?
Clearly the profit making possibilities are not being maximized.
Loved this, even if my state (Texas – it’s so lonely being a Democrat here) would be one of the ones downsized.
Honestly? 1-4 are actually good ideas.
2 and 3 are great ideas.
Not in the slightest.
Which is kind of the point.
1, you’re discouraging innovation, which generally comes back to bite you in the ass.
2 is more defensible, but does make you look like a wuss on an international scale, which is not ideal. Still, can see an argument there.
3 is generally less successful than you’d think, even aside from moral questions. Part of the reason the trade gets so big is the no taxation high risk thing.
And four? Really? Ignoring moral issues, ignoring international repercussions, there’s still a border, which means you have the same problem, and you have to expand again sooner or later, while adding more people mad at you for your failures. We saw it with Rome, for pete’s sake.
People, his terms for #2 are “forget Iraq and Afghanistan exist and move on”.
Meaning that the US would be leaving unstable countries to essentially turn into massive anti-US and anti-West tanks. Again.
In that sense, it’s not quite as good an idea as you may think it is. (Of course the US should leave them, but not in the sense of ‘drop everything and go take over North Korea instead’.)
I love No. 6 because it would let me achieve my lifelong dream of having this conversation with someone:
Me: “I’ve just received word that Obama has permanently dissolved Congress. The last remnants of the old republic have been swept away.”
Friend: “That’s impossible! How will Obama maintain control without the bureaucracy?”
Me: “The governors now have direct control over their states. Fear will keep us in line. Fear of this battle station.”
Friend: “Wait, what?”
George Soros should try running for president.
The sad thing is number 6 is being done on a smaller scale … States are passing laws to be able to easily disolve city governments.
Funnily enough some of these are Trump’s plans, but in different order.
With Iraq and Libya he’s argued we should just take the oil as our spoils of war.
I think my favorite part of the post is that each of these points are the classic sub-half-baked, magic bullet fixes, magical thinking solutions that the “Run the Country Like a Business” set love to bandy about to prove how smart they are in the face of overwhelming complexity. (Disclaimer: yeah, I’m guilt of this, too. It’s way too easy.) I just couldn’t stop laughing about the defense for the poorly thought out premise was continually supported by the exact same sort of thinking.
Careful, though, Glenn Beck may declare MGK president for life. But it would mean that Marvel and DC would be nationalized and made a standard part of the teaching curriculum, which would be nice.
This needs to be seen by more people.
Anyone else remember the Lee Iacocca for President movement? I bet there are older examples as well. Businessmen and Generals are always being held up as unsullied outsiders who can clean the country up. I think it’s all part of our longing for the President to be our national Father Figure.
Don’t forget that the internet is a danger to the IT infrastructure, a drain on resources, an unhealthy distraction to productivity, and a potential source of HR complaints.
Any good business would block access – at least to adult-oriented and social networking sites, gaming too.
Sir, somewhere Jonathan Swift wants to buy you a drink.
2 & 3 are Very Good Ideas and should be treated seriously.
5 is an interesting idea w/some strong arguments to be made both for & against; it’s worthy of debate
6 is a Gawdawful Terrible Idea & one that the GOP is currently embracing
7 is worthy of further exploration. The idea that once a decade the rest of the states can vote one state out of the union (giving them a decade to get their act together & apply for re-admission) is an interesting one.
Hah! Best conversation ever.
…that was supposed to quote Brian Smith up there. Eh.
I actually believe in #3. Legalize everything, disband the DEA, regulate it more strictly than alcohol, and tax the hell out of it.
Oh, and commute the sentences of everyone locked up for all non-violent drug offenses to time served and expunge their records so they can rejoin the pool of free citizens. Close a bunch of prisons and convert ’em into factories. Hire the guards to build stuff.
Amusing list.
I’ve always said that people who think Government should be run like a business know nothing about how Government works, know nothing about businesses operate, or (most likely) know nothing about either.
Predicting the future.