I’ve gotten maybe a dozen emails over the course of the last week from people asking me to weigh in on all the kerfuffle happening over and in regards to Livejournal, which recently has decided to abandon the basic “free” accounts in favour of the “plus” accounts which have web advertisements on them, and has censored (or not, it may have been accidental) fan-fiction “interest” listings. Apparently, since I am a fairly high-profile Livejournal exile, my opinion on this is considered noteworthy.
And it’s fair to ask me, I guess, although I’m not sure what I can especially contribute that anybody else couldn’t. So here we go.
1.) Whining about advertisements is goddamned stupid. (See what I mean when I say “what can I say that hasn’t already been said?”) This is the Internet, folks, and Internet means “requires revenue stream.” I know Livejournal was founded on the premise of paying for itself by using free accounts as content and advertising to drive the sale of paid accounts, but honestly, that was kind of a stupid premise considering that free accounts offered about ninety-nine percent of the functionality of paid accounts. A revenue model more or less based on gettiing people to pay thirty dollars a year for more user icons is a bad revenue model. Livejournal has to get its money from somewhere.
2.) Whining about censorship is fairly pointless. Not entirely pointless, I will grant – it’s of course possible that Livejournal’s new Russian owner people will put down their vodka and caviar and pay attention to hordes of fans yelling on the internet in order to provide good customer service. But it’s not particularly likely, especially when the reasons the Russians bought it in the first place is because they’re more concerned with their Russian customers – you know, the ones who use Livejournal more than any other country does and where its usership is expanding fastest.
Look, I am not pro-censorship; in case you couldn’t tell by my very last post and all the silly Photoshopping and parodic mockery I do, freedom of expression issues mean a very great deal to me. But calling Livejournal’s actions censorship is to ignore that censorship can really only occur when there is no viable alternative to make your views known/publish your work, and in this situation that simply isn’t the case.
(PS. As stated elsewhere: the “internet strike” concept is quite possibly the stupidest thing I have heard of in quite some time, not least because the geniuses behind it scheduled it on Good Friday. Why would anybody not be shocked by a downturn in traffic on a major statutory and religious holiday?)
3.) What Livejournal does well and what it doesn’t. Of course, this has also created the standard round of “I am leaving Livejournal FOREVER” commentary from the usual suspects. The sad thing is that they then say they’re going to Insanejournal or Deadjournal or one of the other half-dozen sites running older versions of the publicly available Livejournal code, all of which are about as reliable as George W. Bush in a liquor store.
As a Livejournal emigre, I’ve had more occasion than some to compare and contrast the service by what it offers and what it doesn’t offer. To wit: Livejournal is easy to use, quite possibly the simplest web publishing service going. But it’s customizable enough that advanced users don’t feel like they’re playing with Tinkertoys. Threaded comments are wonderful things. User icons are fun. The “secure publishing” tools, although they are honestly about as secure as a door made out of Swiss cheese, are for the majority of users good enough for maintaining a reliably private web diary that you can opt to let certain individuals read.
(It should be noted here that, apart from concern over legal issues, which I would honestly like to fight at some point, the reason I haven’t restarted Improved Archie is because Livejournal lent that enterprise a level of functionality that I can’t quite duplicate elsewhere yet, although I’m hopeful that the sifting I’m doing through WordPress plugins pays off eventually.)
And most importantly, Livejournal offers community. I honestly doubt I would have expanded my readership as dramatically as I did in the early days without attracting internet-friends through scans_daily and several other Livejournal communities. The friending system on Livejournal encourages community development in a way that most other social networking and publishing sites just don’t; you can have a blog on Blogger for years and just be a lonely outpost in the internet woods, but Livejournal is almost by definition a growth instrument; it offers all the belly-up-to-the-internet-bar nature of a good web forum or bulletin board without the limiting qualities of same.
The big downside to Livejournal is that it has a ceiling. You can’t use it to generate a profit off your site directly. Sales of creative work, yes. Commissions, yes. Money off advertising the content you’re producing, no. Work on Livejournal thus, in many ways, is work-for-hire at a very, very cheap rate. More notably, Livejournal tends to have a readership ceiling as well; the community nature of the site (and I am not the first to comment on this) tends in most circumstances to drive readers away when they see your large friendslist, countering the “he’s a good writer” appeal with “oh, he’s the most popular kid in school” negatives. There are of course exceptions to this, but they’re more often than not celebrities (well, writer celebrities, which is definitely a given value of “celebrities,” but you get the idea).
4.) On leaving Livejournal. I had honestly been planning to exit Livejournal as my primary web outlet for a few months prior to my expulsion; I had (and this will sound arrogant, but fuck it) outgrown it; it couldn’t do what I wanted and needed it to do any more. This is not to say that I’m happy about the booting – I lost a great deal of work apart from my own journal that I was rather happy with (my scans_daily posts, for example). Also, I lost the “Orlando Jones as Orlando Bloom” Photoshops entirely, which sucks because they were a lot of work.
Since I left, the story of my traffic has been a sharp dip initially (as people didn’t know where to find my new digs), then recovery, then steady and mounting growth in traffic with occasional spikes for something big. (The Mr. Men parodies have been the biggest spike thus far thanks to a major StumbleUpon hit.) That’s how web publishing works: you put out steady content, occasionally people really like a certain something, and some of them stick around and read you regularly. Which is gratifying. But more than that, the sense of community has stuck around as well. Some of the more esoteric stuff that I post doesn’t get a lot of commentary, but other posts get lots of chatter, and believe me, I recognize my regulars when I see them.
So to bring it back around to Livejournal again, my point is this: it’s good at what it does, but it’s not the only fish in the sea, and depending on what you want your Livejournal to be, it might not even be the best option. Yes, web self-publishing is more work. (Not much more work – trust me, the WordPress interface isn’t that hard to use once you get past the initial setup.) But it offers greater rewards in certain areas for those interested, and that’s not nothing.
PS. This is as apropos a time as any to remind those who might want to know that I am still readable via Livejournal; simply subscribe to “mighty_god_king”.
Related Articles
14 users responded in this post
As a Livejournal user, I salute you. You’ve summed the whole thing up pretty much perfectly.
What’s a Live Journal? Is it like some sort of web-based diary? This sounds like it could be big.
“Why would anybody not be shocked by a downturn in traffic on a major statutory and religious holiday?”
Obviously the Godless communists who don’t celebrate Jesus coming back from the dead, after having rolled “rabbit” on table 9-13 as per the rules of the Reincarnation spell.
Well, I for one was too busy making room in my sock drawer for lincoln logs to post on LJ today…
Why aren’t these people using an adblocker? There, problem solved. I’m a paying customer of LJ. I like it enough to think it warrants a few dollars every year. About the censorship, that does make me angry but only because I’ve seen how websites that have open communities have flourished like Deviantart. I wish LJ was run like that, where the content is supported and encouraged (mostly talking about art/writing).
This is timely – at least in my little world. I am currently setting up a WordPress account after years of being an LJ user, which I became after getting frustrated with deleting spam from my MT blog. I agree about the community stuff. A friend of mine migrated to WP a couple years ago, but kept her LJ by cross-posting to LJ. That’s an option I am considering exploring.
About the strike: yeah, a lot of the complaints seemed silly. But I was concerned when I heard the new company deleted bisexual communities. Whether or not its censorship, it was homophobic.
[…] 22, 2008 · No Comments MightyGodKing on the LJ strike: (PS. As stated elsewhere: the “internet strike” concept is quite possibly the […]
Every time I read about someone trying to protest via Internet boycott or e-mailing campaign I remember the time I was asked to participate in an e-mail campaign to get china to free Tibet. The person was genuinely convinced that if enough people e-mailed the Chinese government “They’ll have to listen.”
No in fact, the government with 2 million men under arms, billions of dollars in trade with the US and everyone else, and close ties to the US government does not in fact have to listen when a bunch of geeks on the Internet click “send” on a form letter, they just have some flunky hit delete all day.
Kids today…
More importantly, the only reason InsaneJournal or DeadJournal or GreatestJournal or JournalFen can offer the same carte blanche people wistfully remember about the early days of LiveJournal is that their user base is as low or lower than LJ’s was in those selfsame good ol’ days. If thousands of people really did migrate en masse to any one of these sites, they would be faced with the same technical, content, and customer service issues LJ has grown to face, and they’d probably deal with those issues in equally unpopular ways. To wit, JournalFen crashes every time fandom_wank posts something that everyone on LJ comes over to read, and GreatestJournal quickly collapsed from the strain of taking on refugees from Strikethrough 2007.
I’ve come around on my thinking about you leaving LJ. (Although I still think it smacks of hypocrisy from the “fandom” circles. Let’s face it, your third strike with LJ was posting Harry Potter spoilers, and odds are the person who notified them about that was probably the same sort of person avidly defending the rights of Harry Potter porn authors that same weekend.) At first I was just pissed that I didn’t have the convenience of reading this blog in my friendslist (the syndicated feed is a lot more limited than simply friending an LJ account), but now I see “the blog-o-sphere” going about “diggerating” your site, and it’s more like you “made the big time.” Strictly speaking nothing has changed, but it sounds like a bigger deal to say “Check out this funny picture on MightyGodKing.com” than to say “Check out this funny picture some guy put on his LiveJournal.”
“Threaded comments are wonderful things”
Now this is one thing I can’t agree with at all. I loathe and detest the threaded comments, and it was the main thing keeping me away from LJ. I had considered getting a placeholder account for commenting on friend’s journals, but that’s obviously out now, and it was the threaded comments that kept me hesitating until it was too late.
I’ll go check out something linked at LJ if it looks interesting, but I often back out of the comments if the threading gets to be too much.
I’d rather skip stuff that I don’t care about by fast reading, so it’s still my call, and I always set the view to “flat” or “nest” at places like slashdot or IMDB forums, if LJ offered such an option I probably wouldn’t have stayed away.
The people who keep using the word “censorship” blow me away. It’s not as if they removed the interests in question, and it’s not as if they made them unsearchable. They simply removed them from the Top 100 Interests Page. A page that 99% of existing LJ users hardly ever see.
Who knew it mattered whether or not the word “sex” was listed on a rarely visited webpage.
Jim: I can’t say as to whether I have “made the big time” (inasmuch as having a blog qualifies one for “the big time,” anyway). All I can say definitively is that I kept track of my traffic for a while before I left Livejournal, and that my readership is higher as an independent site. Likely that some of it has do to with branding issues (mightygodking.com is easier to refer back to than an individual Livejournal, as you mentioned), some of it to do with easier site propogation and access to proper trackback tools, etc.
“Kids today…”
C’mon. Are we any more ridiculous than previous generations?
That’s it, I’m quitting the Fantastic Four.