I mentioned on Twitter recently1 that I liked FF #1, the newest iteration of Jonathan Hickman’s run on Fantastic Four, a hell of a lot. Other comic reviews were busy orgasming over the new issue of Batman Inc., which in fairness is quite good.2 But for me, FF was far and away the best comic of the week3, and then someone emailed and asked me why, and it’s been a long time since I did a proper comics review, so why not?
If I had to boil down FF‘s skill in a pragmatic manner, finding the one key element that I think makes it really work as a comic, it’s that Jonathan Hickman and Steve Epting have together done what the best ongoing superhero comics do: provide change which is mostly illusory but nonetheless existent. That’s the magic level of change you want in a great superhero comic: you can make all the huge sweeping changes you like to a character’s raison d’etre, his supporting cast, his costume, you can make him become The Amazing Rutabaga-Man for six months, but in the end these properties have amazing inertia. For example: if you give a character a Stunning New Costume, at best in fifteen years or so it will become a fondly-remembered artifact4; at worst it will become a source of bad comedy.5 I expect the new costumes in FF #1 will fall into the former category; they’re different enough that they’re honestly interesting, and they look good. But we all know that in a few years time we’ll be back to the blue costumes with big 4s on them, and that doesn’t really bother anybody.
Similarly, we know that in time, Johnny Storm will be revealed to not be dead. Hickman can protest as much as he likes that Johnny Storm is dead, but we all know he’s full of crap even if his intentions are honest (and really, given that he had Johnny die conspicuously off-panel, I don’t believe him for a second). But for the moment Johnny’s dead, and what’s important – and what Hickman and Epting do, note-perfect – is enforce the reality that this would traumatize the fuck out of the remaining members of the Fantastic Four. Again, this is not a new idea for writers of the book to explore; Mark Waid and Mike Weiringo did it when they killed off Ben temporarily during their run and there’s been one or two other times where other writers played with the idea as well. But Hickman and Epting’s work in showing how absolutely devastated the FF are is heartbreaking and lovely. Epting’s work on Ben in mourning – and Ben is always the most visually expressive of the FF – are some of my favorite panels he’s done ever.
Equally lovely is the fact that Spider-Man is the temporary replacement for Johnny, which is again perfect. This is not to knock all the other writers who have had Black Panther or She-Hulk or Ant-Man or Crystal or whoever be the “temporary fourth member of the Fantastic Four” – most of the alternates that have come through at one time or another have made story sense and been entirely decent.6 But Fantastic Four is a comic book about a family more than anything else, and over the past decade Spidey steadily became part of their extended family. It just feels like how, when a family suffers a major loss, your uncle maybe moves in for a while to make sure the place doesn’t fall apart. It feels essentially proper in a way that many other alternate members haven’t, and serves to reinforce the sense of loss that the FF have undergone (and Hickman and Epting use that as well). Really, Peter makes more sense as a member of the FF than he ever has as an Avenger.
(It’s worth noting, incidentally, that all of what I’ve mentioned so far is Hickman doing something he’s not really noted for: he’s writing small-ball here rather than playing with the crazy big ideas he built his rep on, and he’s killing it.)
And while Hickman and Epting give the introduction of the new FF – the “Future Foundation,” complete with the array of weirdly brilliant kids they brought in halfway through their run of Fantastic Four – all the due time they need, they also don’t forget to introduce their chosen antagonist. They’ve gone, it seems, with the Wizard, who is an interesting choice precisely because if you’re going to pick an F4 adversary who’s been in need of some stature-building for a long time, I’m pretty sure you have to pick the Wizard. I think every single major run on F4 over the last ten or fifteen years has used the Wizard alongside the Frightful Four at one point or another, and every single time the Wizard is revealed to be a dorky second-rater in a dorky purple helmet. Hickman and Epting, though, in the course of a few panels, make him genuinely intimidating, which is not a word I have associated with the Wizard in approximately ever, and it’s just good to see.
So you have your illusory change: Johnny’s dead! New costumes! Not even calling themselves “the Fantastic Four” any more! And that’s all exciting, but in five years or less it will be memories. But you also have your persistent change: exploration of the family’s trauma, deepening of Spidey’s relationship with them, what looks like an emphatic effort to finally put the Wizard into top-tier villain status. Those two elements, combined, make for what ongoing superhero comics can and should be. That’s why this is a good comic.
- I know, I know… [↩]
- It’s certainly more accessible than at least half of the Batman comics written by Grant Morrison, for a start. [↩]
- Disclaimer: I have not read the new Xombi yet. That might well beat it, if it is anything as good as the first Xombi series was. [↩]
- Say, for example, Dr. Strange’s Trenchcoat of Levitation period, or the time when he was wearing a mask. [↩]
- Say, for example, the Mike Grell-era skin-bearing costume for Cosmic Boy. [↩]
- Well, maybe not Ant-Man. [↩]
Related Articles
22 users responded in this post
Excellent review! I did one for the “final” issue of Fantastic Four, and I agree with all that you said here. Very insightful.
I’ve been on the fence about picking this up since I first heard about the direction F4 was taking. It seemed interesting to me, but in less-capable hands the whole Future Foundation thing would be a joke. Your review has pushed me into giving this title a shot.
The Wizard, eh? He’s a bit of an oddity, in that he can be a fairly decent villain, or a complete joke. Even when played straight, he’s competent but not overly so: I think he was the one guy arrested for Acts of Vengeance.
So spider-man willing joined up? All that “We’re locking up all your friends without trials” during the Civil War just water under the bridge?
Spider-man is such a tool.
You could say that about almost any Marvel character who is talking to any other (or is on the same Avengers team with) that was on the other side, Zenrage.
It’s more a case of “selective editorial plot-convenient continuity-amnesia” than of a fictional character being a “tool.”
It looks like characters aren’t being written to remember Civil War as exactly the same story as the one we read, so writers aren’t totally straight-jacketed by having to hew strictly to continuity established by a mediocre event-driven story.
Not something I can get all that upset over, really; after all, it’s just crappy old Civil War.
I just read FF #1, having not read Hickman’s previous FF work. (Well, I ordered the first two trades when I decided to get the new series.) I ordered based on Hickman’s work on Secret Warriors, and to a lesser extent SHIELD.
I liked it a lot, but thought it focused maybe a bit TOO much on the small, familial aspect. I would’ve liked to see the big, crazy ideas that both Hickman and the FF are known for. I know the big stuff is likely coming later, but an intro issue should set the tone for the series.
I thought Spider-Man fit in very naturally, but I have some concerns over the shared universe nature of this. If Peter’s part of the team, there’s no good reason for him not to move in to the Baxter Building. Nor is there any good reason for him to continue working at Horizon Labs over in ASM. Like I said, it makes sense for this story but not within Spidey’s larger storyline.
So why don’t they just go ask God to resurrect Johnny the same way they asked him to resurrect Ben?
Seriously, once you pull out the literal “Reed figures out a way to go to Heaven and talk to God” card, you’ve pretty much killed drama, haven’t you?
John, God straight out said he closed that door to make sure Reed couldn’t get in there again. The fact is, God let him in there in the first place.
Of course Spider-Man is a tool.
He starts out as Ben Parker’s tool and every once in a while when some organization (SHIELD, FF, Avengers) needs his help, Spidey gets star-struck and will derp along for a while until they don’t need his web-slinging butt at which point he goes back to being Ben Parker’s tool.
Rinse. Lather. Repeat.
clay: When you get and read those first trades of Hickman’s FF run, you’ll find the big crazy ideas you’re looking for. Several things are briefly introduced and played with, and will be followed up in the future.
That’s irrelevant to my point, which is that shitting on Civil-War-established continuity is to be encouraged.
I am surprised you never mentioned Dooms stroke
@Dane, Regarding John Seavey: I thought God just said that the machine Reed rebuilt, the one Doom originally built, had been destroyed – they weren’t going to be able to use it to get back.
But then again, he could just as easily use the Ultimate Nullifier to “reboot” all known existence like he did in the Abraxas Saga. That’s how he wound up with a daughter in the first place…
Frankly I’m still disappointed in Johnny’s “death” in the way it was depicted. Still feels like he went down pretty easy…no sign of a Nova blast ANYWHERE.
I do think though, what would make for an interesting narrative for when Johnny DOES come back, is the revelation that Johnny has always been perceived by Reed, Ben and Sue that he’d been the weakest link of the team for all these years. Why else would Reed, comparatively speaking, not hesitate to go to the afterlife and challenge God himself to get Ben back? Why else would Susan refuse to believe that Reed was dead, when she saw him and Doom (appparently) reduced to ash before her very eyes? Because they’re too important to what the FF are and what they do.
But what if on some subconscious level, each of them couldn’t help but think that just a tiny bit of every mission was spent keeping one eye on Johnny and making sure he didn’t get himself killed?
After all, when one of the other team members left, they were just replaced by one person. Who’d they replace Johnny with? Not only the one other superhero his own age, but a WHOLE SLEW OF CHILDREN.
Now imagine what Johnny would think about that, after fighting his way out of a lengthy stint as Annihilus’ favorite prisoner…
Also, who remembers that Lyja was in the Negative Zone….
I haven’t read this yet. I read a couple of Hickman’s Fantastic Four issues from a year or so ago, and I thought they were pretty awful– not as bad as Millar’s, but still pretty bad.
But I may get this, just to see how well Spider-Man fits in. I don’t like the idea of him being on three teams at once, though. I hope they can convince Bendis to drop him for a while. He’s been an Avenger long enough already.
Okay, I got the first two of Hickman’s FF trades, and they do contain the whiz-bang sense of wonder and exploration that I was looking for.
I can see why Hickman is sometimes compared to Grant Morrison. (At least, Morrison’s mainstream superhero work.) Both come up ideas that are both far out and yet that feel like a natural extension of the existing universe. (Ex. the Council of Reeds, or the Universal Inhumans.)
But also, they both are refreshingly anti-decompressionist; the concepts come fast and furious (and maybe even a little too fast). The “four cities”, for instance, each of those was introduced in a done-in-one issue. If someone like Bendis had done this, each city would’ve been introduced in a six-month storyline, and by the time it was all done, you would’ve forgotten why they were important in the first place.
Good issue, but better than Batman Inc? pft. Yeah, right. Are you for serious?
I agree with the guy above me. Batman Inc was far, far better.
Please. Like Johnny’s not going to be back in time for the 50th anniversary of Fantastic Four #1 in November? I believed Aunt May was dead back in the 90s. To quote a certain ex-President: “Fool me twice… Duuuh …Won’t get fooled again!”
While Hickman is a good writer, killing johnny & putting dr fucking doom in the ff team is a dumb move!
while dr doom is indeed an awesome character he is a DICTATOR. He’s a SUPER murderer. He’s sent dissidents (criminals or not) and old ladies to Hell! He’s kidnapped and tortured and brainwashed and destroyed more lives than corporate America.
And Valeria is all smiles. She’s just pleased as punch that she’s so clever and working this all out with old mister Unka Doom. And what does she think he’s going to do once he’s smart again? Turn his evil fortress into a candy factory?No. He’s gonna kill people! He’s going to kill lots of people! That’s what he does. His name isn’t ironic. What you see is what you get.
It still baffles that writers make Reed even SEE the guy in front of him without spitting on him, remember Unthinkable? Emperor Doom? Onslaught? Or any other time he tried to kill them?
[…] spoke about Hickman’s run on the title a while back when FF #1 came out that Hickman was delivering what ongoing superhero comics needed: the illusion of change. And his […]