Related Articles

29 users responded in this post

Subscribe to this post comment rss or trackback url
mygif

That’s in line with many laws across the United States. Freedom of religion is not always interpreted as the right to have no religion at all.

ReplyReply
mygif
Navy_Blue said on August 24th, 2009 at 3:52 pm

So, Ah…..you should maybe check the date on that article. The couple in that article did in fact win their appeal…in 1971.

-me.

ReplyReply
mygif

…in 1970.

ReplyReply
mygif
Navy_Blue said on August 24th, 2009 at 4:11 pm

in the interest of not just being a smartass, I’ll provide some extra detail: the appeal in question. http://www.americanadoptions.com/adoption/article_view/article_id/2435?pg=1

ReplyReply
mygif

It’s never too late to be outraged.

ReplyReply
mygif

Yep, what Navy and Great Big Nerd said. Why it came to notice *now*, who knows? (It did show up on Snopes’ discussion forum recently.)

I wish Time had a little bigger date on their archival articles– I found myself going “Wot, no photos or video?” on an article about a British bus driver managing to jump the Tower Bridge gap it was opening as he was already on it) with a DOUBLE-DECKER BUS– then realized the article was from 1953…

ReplyReply
mygif

GAH! I posted this to Facebook, and had several of my readers repost it immediately. None of us noticed the fucking date stamp.

ReplyReply
mygif

Yeah. I had the same reaction on both fronts – the outrage and then the facepalming.

ReplyReply
mygif

sigh. nobody likes america.

ReplyReply
mygif

Skwid: Yeah, I just posted an outraged link on Twitter, came and read the comments and then deleted the tweet. Hopefully no one noticed…

ReplyReply
mygif

Ah well. Hopefully that judge is dead by now.

ReplyReply
mygif
NCallahan said on August 24th, 2009 at 5:40 pm

If it makes you feel anybody, Mary Magdalen of the Church of the Subgenius had her son taken away by her ex-husband on the basis that her religious practices were insulting to Christianity. Despite her being a homeowner in Cleveland and her ex-husband, with his history of drinking, living into a trailer out in the middle of nowhere in New York. And this was in the mid-nineties.

ReplyReply
mygif

Aw geez, Canada invaded Michigan. WTF, Canada?

(Does anyone check dates, anymore?)

ReplyReply
mygif

You know, that’s the *second* time I’ve seen that particular article link make the rounds in past-dated outrage, and the last was a couple of years ago. I wonder if it’s been circulating all this time, or if two separate times someone came across it in the archives and didn’t realize it was old.

ReplyReply
mygif
solid snake said on August 24th, 2009 at 6:13 pm

I was just wondering if Chance the gardener had anything at all to do with any of this.

ReplyReply
mygif

I was ready to get all ACLU on someone, but I did not notice the date until I check these comments. I feel like a dope.

ReplyReply
mygif

Yeah, but how crazy is it that an article from 1970 is online now.

ReplyReply
mygif

Yeah.. we had this same “no one checked the date” problem on atheistforums.com when someone posted it this past weekend.

Its still rage worthy, though. I hope that judge got Alzheimer’s.

ReplyReply
mygif

1971? Pfft. It was still constitutional to deny a person custody of kids because they remarried a black person in early 1984.

ReplyReply
mygif

Nobody noticed the date? Really? Granted it’s in a light grey font for some reason, but still…

ReplyReply
mygif

The date popped right out at me. I had about 1 1/2 seconds of rage, followed by “Oh wait…”

It sucked, but it sucked a year before I was born.

ReplyReply
mygif
sgt pepper said on August 24th, 2009 at 8:21 pm

Today’s headline:

Adopted child Seeks emancipation from Christian parents who don’t believe in Halloween, Santa, or the Easter Bunny.

“Send me back!” child pleads.

ReplyReply
mygif
lance lunchmeat said on August 24th, 2009 at 9:09 pm

Ahahaha, try to slander US, will you? Go drink milk from a bag you loony.

ReplyReply
mygif

Here’s a more recent article.

ReplyReply
mygif

plus C:

Good one. I was just about the vomit bile, before the lessons of the past few hours dawned on me and I checked before I ranted. This is what it must feel like to find out your partner has the clap, but you insisted on a condom.

ReplyReply
mygif

This is the internet. All postings happen in present day.

ReplyReply
mygif
Candlejack said on August 25th, 2009 at 12:38 am

It’s okay. I still get worked into a frothing frenzy over Oklahoma’s Adoption Invalidation Law (under which, same-sex couples with legally adopted children lost their parental status while within the state of Oklahoma–forcing doctors, police, etc to treat them, legally, as strangers rather than family), and that’s been, what? Two years since the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals put a bullet in it?

ReplyReply
mygif

plus C:

Clifford Stoll? Dude, I know him. Well, sort of, I haven’t seen him in well over a decade. He could be a bit pedantic at times, but hey, what geek can’t?

ReplyReply
mygif

Oh, and while he was way wrong about online retail and the internet replacing newspapers, he had a major point which still holds true about teaching and his statements on politics are probably debatable. I think his biggest failing in that article was not anticipating the coming advances in search engine technology.

ReplyReply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please Note: Comment moderation may be active so there is no need to resubmit your comments